Message from @SamanthaFluff

Discord ID: 593212400598253579


2019-06-25 22:52:05 UTC  

No they were perfectly predicted by the Saros Cycle 5,000 years ago

2019-06-25 22:52:06 UTC  

sure does

2019-06-25 22:52:08 UTC  

ground track was right on

2019-06-25 22:52:18 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:52:25 UTC  

And as I've already stated Epherimedes uses ground observation data

2019-06-25 22:52:29 UTC  

i used the ephemerides that predicted the last solar eclipse

2019-06-25 22:52:33 UTC  

and it was right one

2019-06-25 22:52:35 UTC  

So it's pattern recognition, not heliocentric modelling

2019-06-25 22:52:39 UTC  

flat earth does none of this

2019-06-25 22:52:43 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:52:44 UTC  

Sure, maybe your method works, but there have been methods that worked just fine in the past and you can build all sorts of intricate models that all give you same-ish result in the end

2019-06-25 22:52:48 UTC  

di dyou forget how i proved you wrong on that already?

2019-06-25 22:53:07 UTC  

@SamanthaFluff so if i can measure distance with a ruler, and a laser, does that mean all distances are measured with a ruler?

2019-06-25 22:53:21 UTC  

@SamanthaFluff yet flat earth can do no such prediction

2019-06-25 22:53:23 UTC  

interesting

2019-06-25 22:53:25 UTC  

Basically, why build some very complicated tool/model if it doesn't give any major benefits with the different models of the past

2019-06-25 22:53:32 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:53:38 UTC  

it gives you the accurate ground track

2019-06-25 22:53:40 UTC  

previous methods didn't do that

2019-06-25 22:53:45 UTC  

nor did they account for terrain

2019-06-25 22:54:17 UTC  

Can I put that 'accurate ground track' onto a sandwich and eat it for sustenance? :'D

2019-06-25 22:54:18 UTC  

Yah... this is called an affirming the consequent logical fallacy

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/593212404964524052/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190626015357.png

2019-06-25 22:54:36 UTC  

lol no

2019-06-25 22:54:40 UTC  

thats call measurement uncertainty

2019-06-25 22:54:47 UTC  

LOGICAL FALLACY: AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT: https://imgur.com/a/P1hsRB4

2019-06-25 22:55:02 UTC  

It's called we have a model, we observe reality. The model doesn't reflect reality, so reality must be wrong.

2019-06-25 22:55:13 UTC  

wrong , it does match reality

2019-06-25 22:55:25 UTC  

Oh I know, let's re-work the model and add some more ad-hoc math in order to "best fit" the real observations

2019-06-25 22:55:25 UTC  

but measurements are imperfect, can you measure somethign with a ruler to 1 millionth of an inch?

2019-06-25 22:55:54 UTC  

All things aside, you're demonstrating a basic misunderstanding. We've heard all the things you're trying to present to us as facts, giving us more of the same thing isn't going to make this conversation any more constructive

2019-06-25 22:55:56 UTC  

hilarious

2019-06-25 22:56:00 UTC  

I'm fairly certain a tunelling electron microscope can

2019-06-25 22:56:04 UTC  

no flat earth model is even close to this

2019-06-25 22:56:12 UTC  

I don't want to conform to a model

2019-06-25 22:56:14 UTC  

@SamanthaFluff this proves all of you wrong

2019-06-25 22:56:14 UTC  

You however do

2019-06-25 22:56:39 UTC  

@Meeper sure, it does, if you have your little victory, will it make you calm down? xD

2019-06-25 22:56:44 UTC  

@Human Sheeple lets see yoru model of light curving up in air

2019-06-25 22:56:53 UTC  

I don't do models sorry

2019-06-25 22:56:55 UTC  

I do science

2019-06-25 22:57:04 UTC  

We have daily lives we wanna live, we're not as interested in winning little senseless arguments about some garbage