Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 593213061507055618
nor did they account for terrain
Can I put that 'accurate ground track' onto a sandwich and eat it for sustenance? :'D
Yah... this is called an affirming the consequent logical fallacy
lol no
thats call measurement uncertainty
LOGICAL FALLACY: AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT: https://imgur.com/a/P1hsRB4
It's called we have a model, we observe reality. The model doesn't reflect reality, so reality must be wrong.
wrong , it does match reality
Oh I know, let's re-work the model and add some more ad-hoc math in order to "best fit" the real observations
but measurements are imperfect, can you measure somethign with a ruler to 1 millionth of an inch?
All things aside, you're demonstrating a basic misunderstanding. We've heard all the things you're trying to present to us as facts, giving us more of the same thing isn't going to make this conversation any more constructive
hilarious
I'm fairly certain a tunelling electron microscope can
no flat earth model is even close to this
I don't want to conform to a model
@SamanthaFluff this proves all of you wrong
You however do
@Meeper sure, it does, if you have your little victory, will it make you calm down? xD
@Human Sheeple lets see yoru model of light curving up in air
I don't do models sorry
We have daily lives we wanna live, we're not as interested in winning little senseless arguments about some garbage
you claiming that light curves up in air is a model
how much does it curve up?
what does it depend on?
@SamanthaFluff makes sense that you dont' care about what's accurate
No it's an observation
Now you're being provocative
@Human Sheeple lol
is that a painting?
how much does it curve up/
@Human Sheeple useless, u got rekt
That depends on the weather conditions
ok well let's see the equations
"depends on weather conditions" is a model
although you haven't made a good one at all
Why because some military controlled computer that got it wrong several times and had to keep reworking it until it approximated reality?
hahaha no
that's not what that says
I would LOVE to see JPL's source code to the epherimedes