why not?

Because nothing is ever settled

are you 100% sure about that?

knowledge based on induction or statistics is not exact or 100%

No

If YOU dont understand how science deals with evidence, that is literally YOUR fault, not ours LOL

so then a rock CAN fall 100% of teh time then?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 you have been going in circles for the past 10 mins, there is really no point, they will not listen

I am never 100% sure of anything.
**INCLUDING THIS STATEMENT!!**
Figure that one out because I'm done with your lunacy.

You don’t find it strange you find yourself in the same camp as a person who believes they live on a ball, spinning, and hurling through unproven void vacuum space at ludicrous speed, Phil?

I know. I'm done. @Nico2020

science does not deal in proof, yet you just keep using that word LOL

And they’re acting like an expert.

An expert in hoodwinking.

@Derek Nelson I'm not in that same boat. Stop presuming and gas lighting me

And stop insulting me

Don’t bullshit me. This isn’t gaslighting

<@246007609151324182> I'm not it's sheeple

Stand your ground.

I am

So fuck off

On what?

A philosophy?

All of my answers have been posted

Figure it out

Answers that can be proven?

Nope

Uhh is this a mod fight

Figure it out

@Mr.science banned

Then you can’t justify why I should bother.

@Human Sheeple ko

Us: here is why science does not deal in proofs
them: NUH UH, I wont look at that but I also dont believe it

Did I ever say I could?

You're not listening

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Nobody is listening

No point in arguing your point if you can’t prove anything.

No shit

Excapt the algorithm

🍄Nomad The Mad Philosopher🍄Today at 10:07 AM
You're not listening

understatement of the century

The AI is listening