Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Discord ID: 594197225681322024


2019-06-28 16:06:07 UTC  

An expert in hoodwinking.

2019-06-28 16:06:12 UTC  

@Derek Nelson I'm not in that same boat. Stop presuming and gas lighting me

2019-06-28 16:06:25 UTC  

And stop insulting me

2019-06-28 16:06:27 UTC  

Don’t bullshit me. This isn’t gaslighting

2019-06-28 16:06:28 UTC  

<@246007609151324182> I'm not it's sheeple

2019-06-28 16:06:35 UTC  

Stand your ground.

2019-06-28 16:06:39 UTC  

I am

2019-06-28 16:06:43 UTC  

So fuck off

2019-06-28 16:06:44 UTC  

On what?

2019-06-28 16:06:50 UTC  

A philosophy?

2019-06-28 16:07:03 UTC  

All of my answers have been posted

2019-06-28 16:07:06 UTC  

Figure it out

2019-06-28 16:07:12 UTC  

Answers that can be proven?

2019-06-28 16:07:18 UTC  

Nope

2019-06-28 16:07:20 UTC  

Uhh is this a mod fight

2019-06-28 16:07:22 UTC  

Figure it out

2019-06-28 16:07:26 UTC  
2019-06-28 16:07:28 UTC  

Then you can’t justify why I should bother.

2019-06-28 16:07:31 UTC  
2019-06-28 16:07:32 UTC  

Us: here is why science does not deal in proofs
them: NUH UH, I wont look at that but I also dont believe it

2019-06-28 16:07:38 UTC  

Did I ever say I could?

2019-06-28 16:07:44 UTC  

You're not listening

2019-06-28 16:07:51 UTC  

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Nobody is listening

2019-06-28 16:07:56 UTC  

No point in arguing your point if you can’t prove anything.

2019-06-28 16:07:56 UTC  

No shit

2019-06-28 16:07:58 UTC  

Excapt the algorithm

2019-06-28 16:08:02 UTC  

🍄Nomad The Mad Philosopher🍄Today at 10:07 AM
You're not listening

understatement of the century

2019-06-28 16:08:04 UTC  

The AI is listening

2019-06-28 16:08:33 UTC  

you dont see the error in saying "nothing can be 100%, but trying to affirm that 100%?@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

2019-06-28 16:08:50 UTC  

I never tried to affirm 100% of anything

2019-06-28 16:08:54 UTC  

you did

2019-06-28 16:08:57 UTC  

Not

2019-06-28 16:08:58 UTC  

that nothign can be 100%

2019-06-28 16:09:02 UTC  

thats yoru assertion

2019-06-28 16:09:04 UTC  

Even that

2019-06-28 16:09:07 UTC  

like i said

2019-06-28 16:09:08 UTC  

100% possible is possible, just the odds are heavily agents it, to a point it would be ludicrous to believe

2019-06-28 16:09:09 UTC  

So figure it out

2019-06-28 16:09:09 UTC  

so things CAN be 100%

2019-06-28 16:09:13 UTC  

No

2019-06-28 16:09:22 UTC  

so your affirming nothign can be 100%