I know. I'm done. @Nico2020

science does not deal in proof, yet you just keep using that word LOL

And they’re acting like an expert.

An expert in hoodwinking.

@Derek Nelson I'm not in that same boat. Stop presuming and gas lighting me

And stop insulting me

Don’t bullshit me. This isn’t gaslighting

<@246007609151324182> I'm not it's sheeple

Stand your ground.

I am

So fuck off

On what?

A philosophy?

All of my answers have been posted

Figure it out

Answers that can be proven?

Nope

Uhh is this a mod fight

Figure it out

@Mr.science banned

Then you can’t justify why I should bother.

@Human Sheeple ko

Us: here is why science does not deal in proofs
them: NUH UH, I wont look at that but I also dont believe it

Did I ever say I could?

You're not listening

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Nobody is listening

No point in arguing your point if you can’t prove anything.

No shit

Excapt the algorithm

🍄Nomad The Mad Philosopher🍄Today at 10:07 AM
You're not listening

understatement of the century

The AI is listening

you dont see the error in saying "nothing can be 100%, but trying to affirm that 100%?@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

I never tried to affirm 100% of anything

you did

Not

that nothign can be 100%

thats yoru assertion

Even that

like i said

100% possible is possible, just the odds are heavily agents it, to a point it would be ludicrous to believe

So figure it out