Message from @thing

Discord ID: 597168396597067807


2019-07-06 20:51:24 UTC  

the formula you posted and the one steve used are equivalent]

2019-07-06 20:51:33 UTC  

Guys sheeple has a 2 TB files on this YOU AINT GUNNA WIN THIS ARGUMENT

2019-07-06 20:51:44 UTC  

but what if the universe is the neural network of God

2019-07-06 20:51:48 UTC  

It is a right angle we look out at. The curvature is C in that equation. A and B are at right angles.

2019-07-06 20:51:54 UTC  

You should also take into factor the elevation in which you are measuring,

2019-07-06 20:52:05 UTC  

ether as a fluid

2019-07-06 20:52:06 UTC  

The earth isn’t a uniformly smooth sphere

2019-07-06 20:52:14 UTC  
2019-07-06 20:52:26 UTC  

Elevation makes no difference looking across a lake. Same on both sides of it.

2019-07-06 20:52:30 UTC  

what if Earth is God's pineal gland

2019-07-06 20:52:36 UTC  

Lol

2019-07-06 20:52:40 UTC  

@thing well your equation doesn't take that into account either

2019-07-06 20:52:49 UTC  

you guys gave the same equation

2019-07-06 20:52:56 UTC  

I know, that’s why there is more to be done then just simple math

2019-07-06 20:53:17 UTC  

I guess it does not but it would be a tiny percentage of an inch difference.

2019-07-06 20:53:22 UTC  

Take the atmosphere into account as well

2019-07-06 20:53:26 UTC  

Air pollution

2019-07-06 20:53:30 UTC  

All of the sort

2019-07-06 20:53:43 UTC  

refraction would be the only thing

2019-07-06 20:53:50 UTC  

and they do account for refraction :p

2019-07-06 20:54:00 UTC  

No they don’t.

2019-07-06 20:54:14 UTC  

i can't verify whether they did it accurately, but they do at least

2019-07-06 20:54:15 UTC  

They usually do basic math without accounting for refraction

2019-07-06 20:54:24 UTC  

I have no clue how you could figure out the exact distance from the center of the earth to get that formula to work with absolute perfection. Why you would care to do so. Wow I might be 0.001 inches off.

2019-07-06 20:54:41 UTC  

i'm just saying what they have done, idk what people usually do

2019-07-06 20:54:56 UTC  

No, you could be tens of feet off. You are doing simple math which isn’t account for the atmosphere

2019-07-06 20:55:44 UTC  

if the atmosphere can curve light around the earth in the globe model also

2019-07-06 20:55:59 UTC  

then it seems ok to say it makes the sun set on FE

2019-07-06 20:55:59 UTC  

Refraction is just a fancy word for mirage. They are more or less the same. Like a mirage refraction is far far less than perfect. You get a wavy image with refraction not a clear perfect image.

2019-07-06 20:56:02 UTC  

The atmosphere does tamper and bend light

2019-07-06 20:56:12 UTC  

the firmament

2019-07-06 20:56:14 UTC  

it does

2019-07-06 20:56:28 UTC  

but we're saying it bends light just so that it can curve around the earth

2019-07-06 20:56:36 UTC  

Not just wavy, there are reasons why scientists must take refraction into account

2019-07-06 20:56:57 UTC  

What is up in the firmament is what allows sunset and sundown. What it is like up there no one knows.

2019-07-06 20:57:00 UTC  

With your equation you are basically looking for curvature on a planet without an atmosphere

2019-07-06 20:57:39 UTC  

it's up for debate what the atmosphere does pretty much

2019-07-06 20:57:50 UTC  

No. I just understand what refraction and mirages are. If i see that well I understand my vision is obstructed.

2019-07-06 20:57:56 UTC  

the globe says it should curve down and FE says it should curve up

2019-07-06 20:58:11 UTC  

It isn’t really up for debate, there are countless research documents on refraction that all have metric data

2019-07-06 20:58:16 UTC  

If I see a lake in the desert I understand it is most likely just a mirage.