Message from @Steve Angell

Discord ID: 597169360406052864


2019-07-06 20:53:30 UTC  

All of the sort

2019-07-06 20:53:43 UTC  

refraction would be the only thing

2019-07-06 20:53:50 UTC  

and they do account for refraction :p

2019-07-06 20:54:00 UTC  

No they don’t.

2019-07-06 20:54:14 UTC  

i can't verify whether they did it accurately, but they do at least

2019-07-06 20:54:15 UTC  

They usually do basic math without accounting for refraction

2019-07-06 20:54:24 UTC  

I have no clue how you could figure out the exact distance from the center of the earth to get that formula to work with absolute perfection. Why you would care to do so. Wow I might be 0.001 inches off.

2019-07-06 20:54:41 UTC  

i'm just saying what they have done, idk what people usually do

2019-07-06 20:54:56 UTC  

No, you could be tens of feet off. You are doing simple math which isn’t account for the atmosphere

2019-07-06 20:55:44 UTC  

if the atmosphere can curve light around the earth in the globe model also

2019-07-06 20:55:59 UTC  

then it seems ok to say it makes the sun set on FE

2019-07-06 20:55:59 UTC  

Refraction is just a fancy word for mirage. They are more or less the same. Like a mirage refraction is far far less than perfect. You get a wavy image with refraction not a clear perfect image.

2019-07-06 20:56:02 UTC  

The atmosphere does tamper and bend light

2019-07-06 20:56:12 UTC  

the firmament

2019-07-06 20:56:14 UTC  

it does

2019-07-06 20:56:28 UTC  

but we're saying it bends light just so that it can curve around the earth

2019-07-06 20:56:36 UTC  

Not just wavy, there are reasons why scientists must take refraction into account

2019-07-06 20:56:57 UTC  

What is up in the firmament is what allows sunset and sundown. What it is like up there no one knows.

2019-07-06 20:57:00 UTC  

With your equation you are basically looking for curvature on a planet without an atmosphere

2019-07-06 20:57:39 UTC  

it's up for debate what the atmosphere does pretty much

2019-07-06 20:57:50 UTC  

No. I just understand what refraction and mirages are. If i see that well I understand my vision is obstructed.

2019-07-06 20:57:56 UTC  

the globe says it should curve down and FE says it should curve up

2019-07-06 20:58:11 UTC  

It isn’t really up for debate, there are countless research documents on refraction that all have metric data

2019-07-06 20:58:16 UTC  

If I see a lake in the desert I understand it is most likely just a mirage.

2019-07-06 20:58:25 UTC  

But I know you’ll say propaganda anyways

2019-07-06 20:58:27 UTC  

and steve has a point too that you can tell when things are refracted, it distorts the image

2019-07-06 20:58:32 UTC  

the magnetisphere basically EMPs anything passing through though so highly doubt much ever got past it from our planet

2019-07-06 20:58:53 UTC  

@raspberry just because you don’t know if it is happening doesn’t mean it isn’t

2019-07-06 20:58:54 UTC  

especially communications-wise

2019-07-06 20:59:11 UTC  

The atmosphere doesn’t care if you know if it works or not lol

2019-07-06 20:59:17 UTC  

we'd have to travel up there o:

2019-07-06 20:59:24 UTC  

<:nasalies:485141702403686403>

2019-07-06 20:59:32 UTC  

@thing my last point was that we could tell because different wavelengths are refracted differently

2019-07-06 20:59:41 UTC  

Jesus was brown

2019-07-06 20:59:41 UTC  

one of the laser tests did account for this

2019-07-06 20:59:43 UTC  

A perfectly calm lake can mirror a mountain behind it. Reflection is what that is.

2019-07-06 20:59:59 UTC  

``"his skin was like bronze and his feet were like brass"``

2019-07-06 21:00:04 UTC  

It’s isn’t that simple, once again 2D thinking

2019-07-06 21:00:07 UTC  

It mostly could not work on a curved earth. You would see the curve.

2019-07-06 21:00:19 UTC  

Perhaps on a small lake it could.

2019-07-06 21:00:21 UTC  

Mostly lol