<:nasalies:485141702403686403>

@thing my last point was that we could tell because different wavelengths are refracted differently

Jesus was brown

one of the laser tests did account for this

A perfectly calm lake can mirror a mountain behind it. Reflection is what that is.

``"his skin was like bronze and his feet were like brass"``

It’s isn’t that simple, once again 2D thinking

It mostly could not work on a curved earth. You would see the curve.

Perhaps on a small lake it could.

Mostly lol

what else would we need?@thing

When there is room for doubt in your beliefs it is probably wrong

do sphere math...over a lake remember, where it should be exact ... and account for refraction by looking at disperison

Don’t whim on some theory that disregards other well developed theories

Yet there are numerous photos taken by people on vacation or professional photographers of this. Each of them proves we live on a Flat Earth as I see it.

FE is a theory, no a belief that is heavily based on the Bible and other religious means. It literally disregards hundreds of years of recent empirical data

"theory of gravity"

Why I put it there. I am not selling propaganda. I am instead trying to analyze what is truth.

That’s the problem @Steve Angell you keep judging science on what you see. You need to stop doing that

Exactly

The speed of light. No I would say that is solid proof.

You guys seem to forget what a theory is

@thing you're the one calling FE a theory like it's a bad thing

It totally destroys the theory.

@Steve Angell just because you can’t understand linear speeds doesn’t mean it is wrong

You make a false assumption.

the linear speeds thing is deeper yeah

Don’t let you misinformation become ignorance

Yup

Linear speed is a theory using as its basis the speed of light.

Very common, instead of taking the time to understand a concept, they disregard it and sound silly.

Circular reasoning to use your theory to prove your theory.

It isn’t circular reasoning, it’s basic level thinking that anyone should be able to comprehend

einstein's relativity isn't "basic level thinking" :p but

It is based on the assumption that the speed of light is proven. Velocity in reality not speed.

it's not totally ridiculous either

We have spent this long discussing how two objects coming together at the same speed can meet at a central point. I feel like I’m in a preschool math class?!

but it doesn't have to be right either

Science uses velocity not speed.

i guess i don't think einstein uses circular reasoning

i just think he says something very cryptic that could end up wrong anyway