Message from @raspberry
Discord ID: 597171353082134545
Don’t whim on some theory that disregards other well developed theories
Yet there are numerous photos taken by people on vacation or professional photographers of this. Each of them proves we live on a Flat Earth as I see it.
FE is a theory, no a belief that is heavily based on the Bible and other religious means. It literally disregards hundreds of years of recent empirical data
"theory of gravity"
Why I put it there. I am not selling propaganda. I am instead trying to analyze what is truth.
That’s the problem @Steve Angell you keep judging science on what you see. You need to stop doing that
Exactly
The speed of light. No I would say that is solid proof.
You guys seem to forget what a theory is
It totally destroys the theory.
@Steve Angell just because you can’t understand linear speeds doesn’t mean it is wrong
You make a false assumption.
the linear speeds thing is deeper yeah
Don’t let you misinformation become ignorance
Yup
Linear speed is a theory using as its basis the speed of light.
Very common, instead of taking the time to understand a concept, they disregard it and sound silly.
Circular reasoning to use your theory to prove your theory.
It isn’t circular reasoning, it’s basic level thinking that anyone should be able to comprehend
It is based on the assumption that the speed of light is proven. Velocity in reality not speed.
it's not totally ridiculous either
We have spent this long discussing how two objects coming together at the same speed can meet at a central point. I feel like I’m in a preschool math class?!
but it doesn't have to be right either
Science uses velocity not speed.
i guess i don't think einstein uses circular reasoning
i just think he says something very cryptic that could end up wrong anyway
Because you take his theories as proven when they are not proven.
The data and research sits on a golden dinner plate for you flat earthers. Yet you don’t even realize that it is there, or you just can’t understand it.
So much in science actually depends on the speed of light varying by frequency. Like shining light through a curved lens.
knowing the speed of light for you isn't proving relativity
We didn’t just come up with 299, 879 m/s (I think that’s it)
Is that it?
and that's true too lol
speed of light in real life is supposed to vary
OOOOFF
as far as propagation
that was embarrassing
Then how does light refraction work? How are the colors of light separated.
so if you measure light, the numbers you get change anyway