Exactly

The speed of light. No I would say that is solid proof.

You guys seem to forget what a theory is

@thing you're the one calling FE a theory like it's a bad thing

It totally destroys the theory.

@Steve Angell just because you can’t understand linear speeds doesn’t mean it is wrong

You make a false assumption.

the linear speeds thing is deeper yeah

Don’t let you misinformation become ignorance

Yup

Linear speed is a theory using as its basis the speed of light.

Very common, instead of taking the time to understand a concept, they disregard it and sound silly.

Circular reasoning to use your theory to prove your theory.

It isn’t circular reasoning, it’s basic level thinking that anyone should be able to comprehend

einstein's relativity isn't "basic level thinking" :p but

It is based on the assumption that the speed of light is proven. Velocity in reality not speed.

it's not totally ridiculous either

We have spent this long discussing how two objects coming together at the same speed can meet at a central point. I feel like I’m in a preschool math class?!

but it doesn't have to be right either

Science uses velocity not speed.

i guess i don't think einstein uses circular reasoning

i just think he says something very cryptic that could end up wrong anyway

Because you take his theories as proven when they are not proven.

The data and research sits on a golden dinner plate for you flat earthers. Yet you don’t even realize that it is there, or you just can’t understand it.

So much in science actually depends on the speed of light varying by frequency. Like shining light through a curved lens.

knowing the speed of light for you isn't proving relativity

We didn’t just come up with 299, 879 m/s (I think that’s it)

Is that it?

and that's true too lol

speed of light in real life is supposed to vary

OOOOFF

as far as propagation

that was embarrassing

Then how does light refraction work? How are the colors of light separated.

so if you measure light, the numbers you get change anyway

the speed

Yup

and supposedly we can tell that it's exact

Simple as that

like idk

refraction is nottt only for boundary of two media two, wow