Message from @zep tepi
Discord ID: 598009460258242611
Just pointing a laser over a large body of water isn’t really measuring it is it
thats how you perform an experiment based on the scientific method
not just cherry pick like you do
What do i cherrypick?
does light bend? derp
You said you had actual measurements.
Yes?
Yes it does
watch the last vid
you just dismissed it out of hand because of derp
I probably already saw it
He’s pointing a laser over a large body of water and then he compares it to ‘the curve calculator’
They’re all the same
he accounts for all other possible factors too, that could deviate the final result
like refraction
I’ll watch it
Mass does not attract Mass folks
***If mass attracts mass then why is nobody attracted to me?***
I’m about 6 minutes into the video and he says the drop should be 10 meters when the laser is level. That’s the point the curve calculater assumes that you do. If you’re 1 meter above sealevel and you tilt that laser untill you can see it on the other side then it’s only 4,5 meters of obstruction. Over a distance of 15 kilometers with standard refraction that’s perfectly plausible.
Not to mention his first 2 attemps failed he could not see the laser
Hello
How is everyone doing
Good
Better than John Lennon, anyway
Pizzagate is real
Non-polotical yet a centrist.......
Wym
@zep tepi “standard refraction” is an unproven excuse that implies the opposite of what refraction actually does to justify being able to see farther than you should. light refracts upwards, not down, as your “standard refraction” implies.
you can make an equation to justify any lie, or as I like to put it, there is more than one way to add up to nine. just because you proved that 8+1=9 doesn’t mean that 7+2, 6+3, and 5+4 don’t add up to the same thing
The earth is round
yes
@Morning Dew where’s the rest of the picture?
ask sheeple i got it from him
e