Message from @California Nightmare

Discord ID: 598022519793909760


2019-07-09 05:10:32 UTC  

Non-polotical yet a centrist.......

2019-07-09 05:20:22 UTC  

Wym

2019-07-09 05:21:53 UTC  

@zep tepi “standard refraction” is an unproven excuse that implies the opposite of what refraction actually does to justify being able to see farther than you should. light refracts upwards, not down, as your “standard refraction” implies.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/598020983483269131/image1.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/598020983483269133/image0.jpg

2019-07-09 05:23:28 UTC  

@Vent there are no hot singles in your area :(

2019-07-09 05:24:28 UTC  

you can make an equation to justify any lie, or as I like to put it, there is more than one way to add up to nine. just because you proved that 8+1=9 doesn’t mean that 7+2, 6+3, and 5+4 don’t add up to the same thing

2019-07-09 05:24:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/598021707134926849/image0.jpg

2019-07-09 05:24:54 UTC  

The earth is round

2019-07-09 05:24:57 UTC  

yes

2019-07-09 05:25:08 UTC  

@Morning Dew where’s the rest of the picture?

2019-07-09 05:25:22 UTC  

ask sheeple i got it from him

2019-07-09 05:25:57 UTC  
2019-07-09 05:26:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/598022040670175243/image0.jpg

2019-07-09 05:26:06 UTC  

e

2019-07-09 05:27:09 UTC  

OK if earth flat then why are there no hot singles in my areA!!!

2019-07-09 05:27:12 UTC  

!mute @Mohbegin troll

2019-07-09 05:27:12 UTC  

2019-07-09 05:27:25 UTC  

gravity and a day-njght cycle can work on a flat earth, that is basic stuff, and furthermore, disproving a model does not require that you substitute it with another model. i firmly believe that no man can ever know the truth shape and proportions of the Earth

2019-07-09 05:27:37 UTC  

earth is round

2019-07-09 05:27:40 UTC  

yes

2019-07-09 05:27:40 UTC  

🌎

2019-07-09 05:27:59 UTC  

My table is also round

2019-07-09 05:28:07 UTC  

@Morning Dew you claim gravity can work on a flat earth?

2019-07-09 05:28:31 UTC  

yes, a constant downward force can work on any model

2019-07-09 05:28:43 UTC  

But that's not what gravity is

2019-07-09 05:28:48 UTC  

It isn't a force

2019-07-09 05:28:50 UTC  

semantics

2019-07-09 05:29:09 UTC  

Yes but label is different from scientific theory

2019-07-09 05:29:21 UTC  

BUT ACKSHUALLY

2019-07-09 05:29:31 UTC  

i don’t play word games with pseuds

2019-07-09 05:29:37 UTC  

Too many people think gravity is a label when it's an explicit explanation of a set of observed phenomena

2019-07-09 05:29:54 UTC  

So you're just using the term inaccurately to create false claims

2019-07-09 05:30:23 UTC  

i hope you feel smart, because that’s all you accomplished with that word salad

2019-07-09 05:30:32 UTC  

i don’t blame you, its how this society is taught

2019-07-09 05:30:47 UTC  

🤔

2019-07-09 05:31:15 UTC  

How was that a word salad

2019-07-09 05:32:22 UTC  

Your claim was wrong since you're using a term incorrectly. If you really want to deny that by saying that I just want to feel smart then be my guest.

2019-07-09 05:33:04 UTC  

it doesn’t matter how you describe what gravity is, the original discussion was about whether or not gravity can exist on another model of the earth. the textbook definition of gravity is irrelevant in that context, which is why your posts are semantic word salad

2019-07-09 05:33:41 UTC  

i described you perfectly, thank you very much

2019-07-09 05:34:34 UTC  

Kek

2019-07-09 05:35:14 UTC  

Except it does matter what gravity is since that's how you can even determine if it works on a flat earth

2019-07-09 05:35:52 UTC  

How you describe gravity is crucial as to whether or not it works on flat earth in the first place