What do u guys think about QM?

Or other physics

You believe in the aether?

Prove it to me

Thought the aether has been a universally dead theory

Apparently not

They're lorenz invariant

Unlike the luminafirous aether

@Human Sheeple How does zero-point energy prove an aether?

that's just QFT

???

@Human Sheeple demonstrating the fact that helium-4 cooled to temperatures close to absolute zero makes it have zero viscosity proves the aether in what way?

And now you're posting completely irrelevant images with no meaning to your prior post

Zero-point energy is due to vacuum fluctuations governed by heisenberg's uncertainty principle

🤔

@Human Sheeple can I get an answer

@cocobanana lmao, "exposed"

@Human Sheeple the aether and vacuum fluctuations are completely different concepts. To claim they're the same means you don't understand one or the other.

@cocobanana bud you clearly have no clue what I'm saying so stop interrupting the debate

@Human Sheeple to propose that they're one and the same means you need a non-standard interpretation coupled with modern physics. The aether is usually associated with the luminafirous aether, which is not lorenz invariant.

@cocobanana ok

@Human Sheeple interesting, though the graviton is pure fantasy as of yet

I disagree

GR works perfectly well

The only regime's where we require quantum gravity are where *both* GR and QM fail

🤔

@Human Sheeple elaborate

You're reffering to einstein, no?

@Human Sheeple is this idea similar to LET?

@L.O.X vacuum energy is a real thing that uses QFT

@Human Sheeple is this lorentz ether theory?

Lorentz ether theory is ad hoc and makes the ether undetectable, SR is the better theory and LET has no actual proof

QFT=/=aether

@Human Sheeple Relativity is supported and proven in a multitude of ways

And you never answered my aether question

Wonder why

@Human Sheeple Can you show me definite proof of the aether?

Spacetime is the unification between three spatial and one temporal dimensions into a continuum.

Components of the stress-energy-momentum tensor can distort it in noticable ways.

Such as, gravity. Or gravitational time dialation.

Gravitational time dialation

Pound-rebka experiment @Human Sheeple

Hafele-Keating experiment @Human Sheeple

@Human Sheeple gravitational time dialation, gravitational redshifts, gravitational lensing, tests of the equivalence principle, and more prove gravity.

Gravity has also been proven through a multitude of experiments in which a direct attraction has been measured.

And now sheeple's gone 🤔

@Human Sheeple I've layed out many proofs of gravity so I'll wait for you to show me why every single one is wrong. And then while you're at it go ahead and prove the reason as to why objects fall.

Gravity is proven by observation

@California Nightmare gravity has been proven before

The mathematical model of general relativity describes gravity and explains its cause.

To test this theory it makes predictions that we verify in observations and tests.

Here are proofs:

Gravitational time dialation, gravitational redshifting, gravitational lensing.

All of these were predicted based upon GR's definition of gravity. And were experimentally verified.

Can your model account for any of these observations?

... anymore gravity deniers?

Except I've already proven gravity, no need to fill out a chat particularly designed to be tedious

The theory made predictions and those were verified

Without our definition of gravity how could you explain all those phenomena

Density?

@Rudi we do now what it is

Gravity is simply the curvature of spacetime due to any nonzero value of the stress-energy tensor

@Steve Angell atom inferometer, Schiehallion experiment

...

See, all the physicist who say that are likely talking about the issue of quantum gravity.

But that's irrelevant to our discussion because of the fact that it only involves the case were gravity is non-renormalizable.

Gravity has a perfect defined cause and effect and it's explained via a theory that can make predictions of phenomena we should observe.

We've observed such phenomena as direct results of gravity.

And have even made predictions and measured reality and observations to show our initial theory was accurate.

This is how general relativity was explicitly proven.

And link/video spamming is extremely annoying to debate with.

@Rudi gravitational time dialation, gravitational redshifting, gravitational lensing

Atom inferometer, Schiehallion experiment

Ample proof for you

Lmfao, I just named numerous proofs?

You send me videos and expect me to watch

I send you actual observation and expect you to at least research if you're unfamiliar

Gravitational time dialation- a measured time dialation due to the effects of the curvature of spacetime

Gravitational redshifting- the red and blue shifting of light as they exit or enter a gravitational well

Gravitational lensing- the bending of light due to gravitational effects

All of these were predicted by general relativity

All of these were observed

@Rudi I'm providing proof, you're just denying it.

Tell me, does density predict this?

Can density explain all these observations

@Rudi which gravity.

And what aspect do you want proof for

Because I've shown multiple observations confirming general relativity

You haven't responded to any thus far

Gravitational time dialation

Hafele–Keating experiment

@Rudi now show me why the experiment is wrong

And show me how density explains the results

I'll wait.

Denial tactics again?

Dodging too

I just named an experiment

And you then claimed that gravity can't be proven and refused to look at the experiment **you asked for**

Interesting debate tactics 🤔