Message from @raspberry
Discord ID: 598028741595234317
even a downwards force doesn't mean there has to be gravity
“Gravity cannot work on anything but a sphere because...”
gravity still IS ONLY a theory folks
@Morning Dew I was pointing out that your conclusion was derived from ignorance. But if your ad homs were calling for me to explain then Alright.
“Things can only go down on a sphere because...”
@Shadow✓ i pretty much agree with you here xp. i could give you their arguments, "theories use the word 'gravity' even when the theory changes," but, yeah, it's still talking about the theory
Gravity will cause anything of sufficient mass to collapse into a sphere
Gravity on a flat earth would cause it to collapse into a globe
oboy shadow you need help
THERE WE GO. was that so hard? was your essay before that really necessary?
collaspe into a globe? thats just nutts
i hope you at least climaxed
@raspberry well newtonian gravity never really gave a cause for it
@Morning Dew do you have a pic of a laser curving upwards? @A Search for Roche's Rifle
@A Search for Roche's Rifle it's not, since that's what gravity in the globe model does
or maybe, and roll with me on this one, gravity, as explained by the globe model could only work on a globe, but the existence of a similar phenomenon could work on a flat earth given the idea that the flat earth had properties which made it impossible to “break into a sphere,” such as, idk, a God holding it together. as you say, you have a phenomenon, and you explain it with a math problem, but that is not the only explanation for that phenomenon. there is more than one way to add up to 9
yes
you presuppose that only a round ball with a 25k circumference could create the 9.8 figure, to which I would say, there could be potentially infinite explanations for that phenomenon, you just HAPPEN to have found one of them. this is a common fallacy i see from your types
its as Tesla said, your math could or could not be related to reality
theoretically, if the ice wall and stuff is infinite, then gravity would work on a flat earth, as all forces will cancel out apart from down
or a spagetti monster happens to create the phenomenon with trillions of invisible omnipresent noodle arms
that can be the only rational explanation
@Morning Dew if you're suggesting to use gravity whilst ignoring how gravity works and making the claim "god stops it from doing this" then sure, you could twist it all you wanted to work for you. Except that isn't really gravity, that's just a version in which specific rules are ignored to make it reconcile with a model it should classically be impossible to exist on.
it would be interesting to see what shape could do that nico lol
my my, that’s some word salad you’ve got there, I’m very impressed, you get a gold star
Not as strongly crafted as your word salad, my friend
i swear its like i can always call your type out before you say anything
you’re not even grasping the socratic challenge i presented you, i am not foolish enough to be intimidated by empty words
@Morning Dew also, your common fallacy that my type seems to consistently present is not completely accurate.
We made an explanation to explain a certain observation, but this explanation also predicts other observations and gives direct mathematical predictions for these observations.
And guess what? When we try to experimentally test and confirm said predictions they turn out to be perfectly consistent with our theory.
you are, as I like to put it, implying there is only one way to add up to 9, because you proved that 8+1 always equals 9. that does not prove it is the only equation that does that
SHEEPLE has a vid of a laser going upwards yes
bending
yes
That's why general relativity (our theory of gravity) has been experimentally shown to be consistent and mirror reality
It may not be the only way, but its shown to be consistent and able to predict phenomena with precision
perfect example, roche, of a math problem that works but is unrelated to reality. Again, @Shadow✓, that does not prove it is the only explanation.
Therefore it can accurately reflect reality and has been shown to
I never said it's the "only" explanation, I said it's an explanation we use because it's consistent with reality. Thus why it's still a modern theory.
i think those demonstrations also rely on a lot of trust in authority rather than direct observation shadow