Message from @Morning Dew

Discord ID: 598036032063143936


2019-07-09 06:17:39 UTC  

depending on the angle changes which direction it refracts

2019-07-09 06:17:43 UTC  

depends on medium and source

2019-07-09 06:18:04 UTC  

still waiting for that experiment that proves light refracts downwards, but I’m glad your egos are in tact. if not, please continue writing irrelevant essays @mineyful INCORRECT, no experiment proves that light can ever refract downwards in air. that is simply a lie told to justify something that has never been proven

2019-07-09 06:18:23 UTC  

So essentially throughout this you've acted like a sophist

2019-07-09 06:18:32 UTC  

Stop you guys. LIGHT REFRACTS UPWARDS

2019-07-09 06:18:36 UTC  

🙀😂

2019-07-09 06:18:39 UTC  

Definetly seen your type

2019-07-09 06:18:58 UTC  

let them keep going, i don’t want to prevent their egos from being stroked, afterall its why they’re here

2019-07-09 06:19:09 UTC  

mate you gotta cool it with the attacks

2019-07-09 06:19:13 UTC  

we're just trying to debate

2019-07-09 06:19:16 UTC  

I ask rhetorically since i know there is no experiment to prove what they claim

2019-07-09 06:19:28 UTC  

@mineyful don't, he's baiting with ad homs.

2019-07-09 06:19:30 UTC  

Explain what you mean by "refract downwards in air"

2019-07-09 06:19:37 UTC  

yeah lots of loaded questions and ad hom

2019-07-09 06:19:50 UTC  

He's a sophist, no suprise

2019-07-09 06:20:03 UTC  

a person who reasons with clever but fallacious arguments.

2019-07-09 06:20:18 UTC  

I'm gonna head out now you guys have fun

2019-07-09 06:20:42 UTC  

“standard refraction” implies downward refraction. not only do you not have an experiment to prove this, but you contradict the equation by implying that it can actually refract in the opposite of what is “standard” and taken for granted in every equation. by all means, continue projecting sophistry onto me

2019-07-09 06:21:18 UTC  

As much as I try I cannot find a standard refraction definition, do you mind linking a source

2019-07-09 06:21:38 UTC  

I know you've already run away from our debate but in the end you've made no substantial claims besides using a strawman to argue and the consistent ad homs. So mate, you're a sophist.

2019-07-09 06:21:41 UTC  

can’t wait for more words that aren’t A)an experiment or B)an explanation for why you just contradicted yourself

2019-07-09 06:22:18 UTC  

you think i care if you write more essays about how you’ve won? go ahead, yours in the only ego that needs to do such vain things

2019-07-09 06:22:35 UTC  

link source please

2019-07-09 06:23:14 UTC  

@mineyful 7/6*R

2019-07-09 06:23:19 UTC  

and i'm still trying to find out your arguemnt

2019-07-09 06:23:22 UTC  

what does that even mean

2019-07-09 06:23:29 UTC  

Not writing essays, merely pointing out your fallacious style of debate. Another ego remark too, unsurprisingly.

2019-07-09 06:23:37 UTC  

It's the molar mass constant?

2019-07-09 06:23:40 UTC  

meta discussion, thats what you’re doing

2019-07-09 06:23:43 UTC  

Hai

2019-07-09 06:24:02 UTC  

That's far from a source it's just a term by itself with no context

2019-07-09 06:24:23 UTC  

Show. Me. An. Experiment. Which. Proves. Light. Refracts. Downward. As. 7/6*R. Implies. Or. You. Have. Lost. The. Debate.

2019-07-09 06:24:30 UTC  

What is 7/6R

2019-07-09 06:24:34 UTC  

where is it coming from

2019-07-09 06:24:38 UTC  

what is its name

2019-07-09 06:24:42 UTC  

and how did you derive it

2019-07-09 06:25:42 UTC  

Atmospheric refraction

2019-07-09 06:25:46 UTC  

look up the term “standard atmospheric refraction” and don’t waste time in a discussion you’re not qualified to have. i already know you don’t have an experiment, i just wanted to see how long you’d stroke your egos

2019-07-09 06:26:02 UTC  

apparently for hours

2019-07-09 06:26:14 UTC  

It's an approximation on the perceived effects of refraction on earths apparent curvature.

2019-07-09 06:26:29 UTC  

I gave you a bunch of tries so it seems like you're not up for a semi-serious debate