Message from @sigruna14
Discord ID: 550732146365431829
The electoral college got together in a convention and voted for a President. Because really, POTUS doesn’t represent The People. POTUS represents The States
Congress represents The People
SCOTUS represents The Constitution
It was a good idea but its clearly not a nash equilibrium solution
Never forget what they've taken from us.
The only way we will be on a cover photo is if they are attempting to engineer our life style. The double standards are incredible
Nash equilibrium is to import 100m africans
POTUS enforces the laws for The States, which are determined by The People of Congress, as examined by SCOTUS in preserving The Constitution
Yeah its just not a game with a stable solution
It’s beautiful, but has been perverted
It's pervesion in such a short time is proof that it does not work. Europe fell down the same path once they abandoned their kingdoms
The kingdoms are often portrayed as harsh and not representative of their people, but what has democracy really done for them?
Replaced them.
Monarchy suffers from succession problems
I'm not arguing for it, I'm just saying that it was much better, for a thousand years, at retaining its people
It is constitutional. Originally the people weren't even supposed to have a hand in electing the President. The fact that states decided to allow the people to influence the election is just something they decided to do. A gift they gave us and can take away.
The truth is, power corrupts.
Power lets you show your flaws
Its not inherently corrupting
Power is like a magnifying glass for mental and emotional deficiencies
@sigruna14 I wouldn't be too against that, but with our leaders in every corner of the country not representing the people I would not trust them to make that decision, they would elect a Cohen really quick
There's no measures we can take? No court that we can challenge this in?
The wording of the law makes a difference but there is a legal way to accomplish their intent
I know there are streets to March in, I'm surprised that the rural areas aren't flooding the city streets right now
The measure would be elect a new CO legislature
@Jordan - MD Unless I'm very mistaken, there's nothing in the Constitution that says the states have to consider the will of the people at all in appointing electors. So no. Nothing other than a constitutional amendment.
Wealth and booming cities always multiplies liberals
This is why they want to legalize marijuana everywhere they go, it helps keep the sheep complacent
As much as I'm tactically pro-unitary executive, as time goes on, it seems more and more to me that subsidiarity is going to be part of the answer to our problems. We need to decentralize authority as much as possible, because the worse of our elites have shown their malevolence, and the even the best have shown themselves to be completely impotent.
@Bjorn - MD Article 1 Section 8 was supposed to do just that, but they don't care.
Novel decentralized goverment solutions are now possible given distributed ledger tech
But none have emerged yet
Half the laws Congress makes shouldn't pass constitutional muster without amending the powers of Congress.
I know it's a pipe dream but I would welcome a true populist dictator at this point. These problems are very time-sensitive
Government at most abstract level is a collective action problem which distributive ledger solves
@sigruna14 Here’s the thing about The Constitution, however. It’s not a “restrictive” document when it comes to authority it grants the government. It’s “permissive.” It tells the government what it has the authority to do. If it’s not a power granted by The Constitution, in writing, it’s not a power granted by omission.
CPAC is so dull
Check out @ahardtospell’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/ahardtospell/status/1100834951166115846?s=09
@sigruna14 True, but I'm talking *deep* decentralization (referenda, recalls, and the return to a non-federally coopted system of local collective defense).
@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL too bad all real power is vested in SCOTUS. Worst oversight by founders tbh
@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL Tenth Amendment says the states can do anything other than what the Constitution explicitly says they can't or reserves for Congress.
Constitution is kinda dead. What matters is SCOTUS precedent