Message from @Perfict
Discord ID: 604801466129186847
Do you know how magnets work?
no do you
Because that is the same train of thought of the 'graviton' theory of gravity
i disproved cavendish, and i thought i would get reward
How would you go about doing that
no cavendish no experiment that proves gravity, pseudoscience
I get that part. I'm asking how would you prove his experiment to be false
we covered this nelson scroll up if you forgot
No you didn't
well you can believe me or not
How can you disprove that those metal balls don't attract each other on a torsion balance?
we're going in circles
No, we hit a bump in the road
I'm not going over it again
We never got here
alright good talk
bye
Ok if your done then goodbye
We paused at Chapter one
bye
*** *** If what you had said truly disproved the Cavendish Experiment then yes that would be interesting. And if you could disprove the Cavendish Experiment, I would be urging you to go to your local university and talk with them, they would be falling all over themselves just to attach their name to your radical new proof. It would make a lot of people famous.
*** *** The Cavendish Experiment shows that two bodies are attracted to each other. It also shows that the attraction is based on the mass of the bodies involved. It does not attempt to explain why that attraction is taking place. So, when you say that it is not an unexplained force that acts undetected over distance and is based on the mass of the bodies involved. And that it is instead an unexplained distortion in the fabric of space that is based on the mass of the bodies involved. That really makes no difference in the experiment, its results, or what those results show, because that all addresses why the attraction is taking place.
People actually believe gravity doesn’t exist?
Pretty much
w t f
That’s fairly cretinous
Go to that Circus Act they call Cavendish. Utter nonsense. They do it the same way now as the discredited way that was disproven. Magnetic attraction is far stronger, yet they do not measure is that what is the attractive force. Electrical attraction is far stronger. But again not measured.
It is just a Circus Act.
How is it a 'circus act'
Where is your experiment to disprove it?
The Earth’s gravitational force has an effect on the gravitational force of smaller objects
Magnetic attraction is only stronger than smaller objects. I doubt a magnet can compare the the gravitational pull of a neutron star.
What's your point?
To say magnetic attraction is stronger, that is just false. It differs from the strength of the magnet and the mass of the object.
That was towards Steve’s comment
Yea but of the 4 fundamental forces gravity is technically the weakest
oh I see
Relatively yes it is the weakest. Although I’m not sure if the “weak nuclear force” is stronger or not though.
it's okay to say magnetism is "relatively" stronger
but it's like implied that it means like
between 2 fundamental particles or something
the weak nuclear force, electricity, and magnetism are all one too