How would you go about doing that

no cavendish no experiment that proves gravity, pseudoscience

I get that part. I'm asking how would you prove his experiment to be false

we covered this nelson scroll up if you forgot

No you didn't

well you can believe me or not

How can you disprove that those metal balls don't attract each other on a torsion balance?

we're going in circles

No, we hit a bump in the road

I'm not going over it again

We never got here

alright good talk

bye

Ok if your done then goodbye

We paused at Chapter one

bye

*** *** If what you had said truly disproved the Cavendish Experiment then yes that would be interesting. And if you could disprove the Cavendish Experiment, I would be urging you to go to your local university and talk with them, they would be falling all over themselves just to attach their name to your radical new proof. It would make a lot of people famous.

*** *** The Cavendish Experiment shows that two bodies are attracted to each other. It also shows that the attraction is based on the mass of the bodies involved. It does not attempt to explain why that attraction is taking place. So, when you say that it is not an unexplained force that acts undetected over distance and is based on the mass of the bodies involved. And that it is instead an unexplained distortion in the fabric of space that is based on the mass of the bodies involved. That really makes no difference in the experiment, its results, or what those results show, because that all addresses why the attraction is taking place.

@Umwhat show me exactly how you disprove Cavendish

People actually believe gravity doesn’t exist?

Pretty much

w t f

That’s fairly cretinous

Go to that Circus Act they call Cavendish. Utter nonsense. They do it the same way now as the discredited way that was disproven. Magnetic attraction is far stronger, yet they do not measure is that what is the attractive force. Electrical attraction is far stronger. But again not measured.

It is just a Circus Act.

How is it a 'circus act'

Where is your experiment to disprove it?

The Earth’s gravitational force has an effect on the gravitational force of smaller objects

Magnetic attraction is only stronger than smaller objects. I doubt a magnet can compare the the gravitational pull of a neutron star.

What's your point?

To say magnetic attraction is stronger, that is just false. It differs from the strength of the magnet and the mass of the object.

That was towards Steve’s comment

Yea but of the 4 fundamental forces gravity is technically the weakest

oh I see

Relatively yes it is the weakest. Although I’m not sure if the “weak nuclear force” is stronger or not though.

it's okay to say magnetism is "relatively" stronger

but it's like implied that it means like

between 2 fundamental particles or something

the weak nuclear force, electricity, and magnetism are all one too

but yeah who knows which one is stronger

Is the space station real?

I’m having doubts

Coz like every time I watch the “view” there’s always something that goes wrong