Message from @Umwhat

Discord ID: 604793434309656596


2019-07-27 21:48:27 UTC  

I just said GR explains mass attracting mass

2019-07-27 21:48:38 UTC  

Not disproving it

2019-07-27 21:49:36 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/604792534484647966/62a8a51.jpg

2019-07-27 21:49:44 UTC  

it explains the appearance of mass attracting mass which is said to not exist

2019-07-27 21:49:56 UTC  

No

2019-07-27 21:50:00 UTC  

yes

2019-07-27 21:50:04 UTC  

Clearly mass attracts mass dude

2019-07-27 21:50:12 UTC  

Drop something on the ground

2019-07-27 21:50:27 UTC  

flat earthers say, how do you know what caused that

2019-07-27 21:50:36 UTC  

someone told you gravity

2019-07-27 21:50:53 UTC  

But you think what

2019-07-27 21:50:58 UTC  

We should say GR?

2019-07-27 21:51:11 UTC  

no I am saying mainstream science atm thinks it is GR

2019-07-27 21:51:19 UTC  

Ok

2019-07-27 21:51:26 UTC  

Well, what do you think?

2019-07-27 21:51:52 UTC  

I really don't know could be something like magnets

2019-07-27 21:52:06 UTC  

Ah

2019-07-27 21:52:22 UTC  

Do you know how magnets work?

2019-07-27 21:52:27 UTC  

no do you

2019-07-27 21:52:46 UTC  

Because that is the same train of thought of the 'graviton' theory of gravity

2019-07-27 21:53:11 UTC  

i disproved cavendish, and i thought i would get reward

2019-07-27 21:53:27 UTC  

How would you go about doing that

2019-07-27 21:53:44 UTC  

no cavendish no experiment that proves gravity, pseudoscience

2019-07-27 21:54:23 UTC  

I get that part. I'm asking how would you prove his experiment to be false

2019-07-27 21:54:38 UTC  

we covered this nelson scroll up if you forgot

2019-07-27 21:54:45 UTC  

No you didn't

2019-07-27 21:54:58 UTC  

well you can believe me or not

2019-07-27 21:55:15 UTC  

How can you disprove that those metal balls don't attract each other on a torsion balance?

2019-07-27 21:55:32 UTC  

we're going in circles

2019-07-27 21:55:43 UTC  

No, we hit a bump in the road

2019-07-27 21:55:44 UTC  

I'm not going over it again

2019-07-27 21:55:50 UTC  

We never got here

2019-07-27 21:55:59 UTC  

alright good talk

2019-07-27 21:56:05 UTC  

bye

2019-07-27 21:56:10 UTC  

Ok if your done then goodbye

2019-07-27 21:56:28 UTC  

We paused at Chapter one

2019-07-27 22:24:32 UTC  

bye

2019-07-27 22:25:06 UTC  

*** *** If what you had said truly disproved the Cavendish Experiment then yes that would be interesting. And if you could disprove the Cavendish Experiment, I would be urging you to go to your local university and talk with them, they would be falling all over themselves just to attach their name to your radical new proof. It would make a lot of people famous.

*** *** The Cavendish Experiment shows that two bodies are attracted to each other. It also shows that the attraction is based on the mass of the bodies involved. It does not attempt to explain why that attraction is taking place. So, when you say that it is not an unexplained force that acts undetected over distance and is based on the mass of the bodies involved. And that it is instead an unexplained distortion in the fabric of space that is based on the mass of the bodies involved. That really makes no difference in the experiment, its results, or what those results show, because that all addresses why the attraction is taking place.

2019-07-27 23:32:13 UTC  

@Umwhat show me exactly how you disprove Cavendish

2019-07-27 23:32:35 UTC  

People actually believe gravity doesn’t exist?

2019-07-28 00:19:07 UTC  

Pretty much