I would say yes

How would you be able to analyze the force attracting them each other?

Or disproving it is mostly set on the bellief that those in power lie to us

From their motion

Wouldn't that be already thinking gravity exists?

Exactly @Alpha

Nope

It’s analyzing any and all forces

Okay, how would you analyze the forces that attract each other when they are several light years away or even more accurately?

You’d be surprised if you looked into physics or astronomy a little more

o o o

Can you explain it briefly? Take your time

In physics there’s an equation for just about everything

Really there are far too many

And all of them can be derived from observations you can make on your own

You don’t just have to trust the word of whoever derived it first

Do it yourself

You're just dodging the question at this point, how would you be able to analyze the forces that attract them with your equations?

Yes, explain me the scientific method

So I can do it myself

I don’t see why I have to answer the question?

For gravity cavendish experiment

Of course I don’t have a full in depth laboratory style procedure for you to follow step by step

I’m not a professional by any stretch

Okay lol, so you have nothing that can analyze the attraction between 2 masses? You just know how these 2 masses move according to hubble law?

Or you get dense like 800 pound masses and a meter stick which is hard to get

And see now you’re making logical fallacies

The problem in trying to disprove gravity is that it is tied to several other theories and plays a big role in the model currently accepted by the scientific community, so disproving it doesn't mean to solely tackle it's existence but also the interactions it has with other theories (I don't know if I'm properly explaining my point, I apologize for the choice of words)

I simply told you that the process is complex and that if you want to better understand it you should look into it yourself

You followed up by telling me “oh yeah so it can’t be done”

Laziness does not equate to disproof

like for example that gravity created all planets and suns in the current model

You're main hypothesis was trying to prove gravity, you're the one with the logical fallacies here. Thank you for telling me that you can't analyze that 2 masses will attract each up other. Your response was disappointing

It can be done at home but its expensive

We literally told you you can

@rivenator12113 well then. If you'd like to say that the hypothesis she represented is wrong, then i would like you to present a hypothesis that is correct.

I understand that you’re trying to dominate the argument through personal degradation but seriously all I did was invite you to look into a complex form of analysis and all you did was turn me down

Gravity is also tied to magnetism and some objects have clearly observable magnetic properties, you would also need to sever the ties between gravity and magnetism

You not wanting to actually do your research on something that’s too complex for me to explain just shows that your opinion is uninformed

Mate, he only told me how to 2 objects move according to Hubble law. I asked him how can we analyze and know that these 2 objects attracted each other then he dodged into oblivion.

I didn’t dodge the question