sorry nasa and all government space agencies

I have a question

I haven't really done much research on the flat earth theory so forgive me but

The concept of a spherical earth has been around since ancient greece

I'm back, what did you say that can prove gravity if you can know how 2 objects move according to Hubble law?

in ancient greece they theorized it could be a sphere

@rivenator12113 you analyze the forces and trace a source for each one

I wouldn't say widespread belief

That’s why i said the concept

Are there any strong evidence or theories to disprove the globe earth?

Debatable

I would say yes

How would you be able to analyze the force attracting them each other?

Or disproving it is mostly set on the bellief that those in power lie to us

From their motion

Wouldn't that be already thinking gravity exists?

Exactly @Alpha

Nope

It’s analyzing any and all forces

Okay, how would you analyze the forces that attract each other when they are several light years away or even more accurately?

You’d be surprised if you looked into physics or astronomy a little more

o o o

Can you explain it briefly? Take your time

In physics there’s an equation for just about everything

Really there are far too many

And all of them can be derived from observations you can make on your own

You don’t just have to trust the word of whoever derived it first

Do it yourself

You're just dodging the question at this point, how would you be able to analyze the forces that attract them with your equations?

Yes, explain me the scientific method

So I can do it myself

I don’t see why I have to answer the question?

For gravity cavendish experiment

Of course I don’t have a full in depth laboratory style procedure for you to follow step by step

I’m not a professional by any stretch

Okay lol, so you have nothing that can analyze the attraction between 2 masses? You just know how these 2 masses move according to hubble law?

Or you get dense like 800 pound masses and a meter stick which is hard to get

And see now you’re making logical fallacies

The problem in trying to disprove gravity is that it is tied to several other theories and plays a big role in the model currently accepted by the scientific community, so disproving it doesn't mean to solely tackle it's existence but also the interactions it has with other theories (I don't know if I'm properly explaining my point, I apologize for the choice of words)

I simply told you that the process is complex and that if you want to better understand it you should look into it yourself

You followed up by telling me “oh yeah so it can’t be done”