Message from @Alpha

Discord ID: 607041189769642004


2019-08-03 02:42:32 UTC  

Give me a damn scientific article that can prove gravity with the scientific method

2019-08-03 02:42:40 UTC  

Newton

2019-08-03 02:42:45 UTC  

newton

2019-08-03 02:42:47 UTC  

And i’m not trying to attack your position and i’m actually entirely open to its possibility

2019-08-03 02:42:48 UTC  

Scientific method

2019-08-03 02:42:49 UTC  

I believed in the globe until very recently

2019-08-03 02:42:51 UTC  

Is that too hard?

2019-08-03 02:42:57 UTC  

no I'm not so sure

2019-08-03 02:43:02 UTC  

i belived the earth was flat till i developed a brain

2019-08-03 02:43:02 UTC  

I don't wanna know what is what, I wanna know how is what

2019-08-03 02:43:15 UTC  

to have a globe you must have gravity

2019-08-03 02:43:20 UTC  

I simply lean toward whatever seems more logical and makes less assumptions

2019-08-03 02:43:42 UTC  

so that there is no up or down while our space ball is floating in nothing

2019-08-03 02:43:49 UTC  

Gravity is this and that, I don't give 2 shits, prove me gravity exists.

2019-08-03 02:43:58 UTC  

Why do I need to

2019-08-03 02:43:59 UTC  

Give me a scientific method

2019-08-03 02:44:14 UTC  

Look okay lemme lay something out here

2019-08-03 02:44:22 UTC  

But you want people to prove gravity exists according to the flat Earth model?

2019-08-03 02:44:27 UTC  

You tried to first prove it to me with the scientific method then went full red herring fallacy and derailed your thesis lol

2019-08-03 02:44:44 UTC  

A model that doesn't even recognize gravity

2019-08-03 02:44:57 UTC  

And is built totally ditching it's effect?

2019-08-03 02:45:21 UTC  

Look up what burden of proof means @Alpha

2019-08-03 02:45:44 UTC  

I know what burden of proof means

2019-08-03 02:45:57 UTC  

FALLACY REEEEEE
- ever heard of the "fallacy" fallacy? Just because you claim it follows a fallacy doesn't mean you refute it.

2019-08-03 02:46:02 UTC  

Why don't you prove it exists instead of shifting it on me to prove to you that it doesn't?

2019-08-03 02:46:07 UTC  

The concept of gravity is a simple solution. It explains a whole lot of stuff without jumping through hoops. It’s simple and clean and makes a whole lot of sense. The flat earth model that believes gravity doesn’t exist on the other hand has some acrobatic logic making twists and turns trying to explain every little thing with every little workaround possible.

2019-08-03 02:46:23 UTC  

Im just saying you can't expect people to prove the existance of something according to a model build around the premise that it doesn't exist

2019-08-03 02:46:53 UTC  

so balls floating in space that move on their own that are super large and distant all based on zero scientific evidence makes more sense?

2019-08-03 02:46:54 UTC  

False conclusion, things falls down therefore water stick on a sphere?

2019-08-03 02:46:54 UTC  

They just did? They proved it multiple times and yet you refute it because "fallacy lol"

2019-08-03 02:47:24 UTC  

Water is mass like everything else

2019-08-03 02:47:28 UTC  

You know that right?

2019-08-03 02:47:30 UTC  

Give me an irrefutable sound and valid premise with a conclusion or a scientific method article that explains it. Not that hard

2019-08-03 02:47:40 UTC  

Newton

2019-08-03 02:48:00 UTC  

Not an argument

2019-08-03 02:48:08 UTC  

If a sphere as big as earth sticks together then the water naturally would have stick to it as well?

2019-08-03 02:48:15 UTC  

I’m sure you follow that train of thought

2019-08-03 02:48:24 UTC  

Water is *part* of the sphere

2019-08-03 02:48:28 UTC  

Newton introduced the idea of gravity

2019-08-03 02:48:30 UTC  

it is mass

2019-08-03 02:48:40 UTC  

And also