Message from @The Loftus Nerd
Discord ID: 607040705558347803
You and the earth
if you believe in the Flat earth model you don't need gravity
Well
@Edillon Things falling down does not equate to water stick to a sphere. False conclusion fallacy
Then it's all pure bellief
I need a scientific method, you worship science.I'm very open
I don’t worship science
There is nothing wrong with bellief but that is kinda hypocritical when you condemn globe earthers for their "blind bellief"
That’s where you’re wrong
You worship gravity yet can't even prove it. You dodged my questions a milion times
I don’t worship gravity
Give me a damn scientific article that can prove gravity with the scientific method
Newton
newton
And i’m not trying to attack your position and i’m actually entirely open to its possibility
Scientific method
I believed in the globe until very recently
Is that too hard?
no I'm not so sure
I don't wanna know what is what, I wanna know how is what
to have a globe you must have gravity
I simply lean toward whatever seems more logical and makes less assumptions
so that there is no up or down while our space ball is floating in nothing
Gravity is this and that, I don't give 2 shits, prove me gravity exists.
Why do I need to
Give me a scientific method
Look okay lemme lay something out here
But you want people to prove gravity exists according to the flat Earth model?
You tried to first prove it to me with the scientific method then went full red herring fallacy and derailed your thesis lol
A model that doesn't even recognize gravity
And is built totally ditching it's effect?
Look up what burden of proof means @Alpha
I know what burden of proof means
FALLACY REEEEEE
- ever heard of the "fallacy" fallacy? Just because you claim it follows a fallacy doesn't mean you refute it.
Why don't you prove it exists instead of shifting it on me to prove to you that it doesn't?
The concept of gravity is a simple solution. It explains a whole lot of stuff without jumping through hoops. It’s simple and clean and makes a whole lot of sense. The flat earth model that believes gravity doesn’t exist on the other hand has some acrobatic logic making twists and turns trying to explain every little thing with every little workaround possible.
Im just saying you can't expect people to prove the existance of something according to a model build around the premise that it doesn't exist
so balls floating in space that move on their own that are super large and distant all based on zero scientific evidence makes more sense?
False conclusion, things falls down therefore water stick on a sphere?