Collecting data as he went

take a ball, release it from your grip. The law of inertia states that it must stay in place for gravity not to exist, but it doesnt. It falls towards the ground.
If you would like to state that this is due to density, take the same ball, and drop it in a vacuum. The ball will display the same exact result.

Which consistently fell in line with his theory

yes but what is spacetime

rivenator12113#1610 LANGUAGE!!!

Seems like I wasted enough time, please message me something interesting when you find out that you can prove gravity with no idea how to finish them. I'm very open

The downward force that effects the ball is a phenomena named gravity.

It’s a phrase used to describe spatial dimensions and the precession of time as one unit that interacts

Actually. You are technically wrong. the ball will fall faster in vacuum do to the fact there is less resistance @CryingInGravity

My point is gravity plays a big part in the globe earth theory while it is totally ditched in the flat Earth theory

I want the scientific method @Arachidamia if you ever message me

@Citizen Z That’s a technicality that doesn’t matter at all in this scenario

@Citizen Z that still proves there is a downward force effecting the object does it not?

It matters cuz you said the same

@rivenator12113 if you want the scientific method then I invite you to use it yourself

is there an object or thing that isn't an idea in our existence that is spacetime

no

Well then I stand corrected.

Cause that’s not how it works @Umwhat

@Arachidamia If you don't have it don't say you can prove gravity

But you want people to prove the existance of gravity while basing on the flat Earth theory, a theory that was build around the premise that gravity isn't real in the first place

I would like you all to prove warping space and time using the scientific method

Im waiting

then please enlighten me @Arachidamia

Ping when you r rdy

@Citizen Z oohoo boy now that’s a good one okat

Okayokay

So

Proving gravity isn't as linear as you make it seem

You said you want the scientific method

Like

Hypothesis leading to a conclusion

Because your belliefs are against everything that gravity is set on

I’ll take that as a yes

So if you deny the existance of the bases you can't expect people to prove it

It's like building a house

Okay so the hypothesis is that space and time can be warped

You can't expect people to build the second floor without the first

he is asking only because he believes it unprovable @Alpha

Or better yet our null hypothesis is that it cannot be

@Citizen Z Don't bother, he will give you a half-@ss scientific method then shift the burden of proof on you