Message from @Alpha
Discord ID: 607044688503111711
is there an object or thing that isn't an idea in our existence that is spacetime
no
Well then I stand corrected.
Cause that’s not how it works @Umwhat
@Arachidamia If you don't have it don't say you can prove gravity
But you want people to prove the existance of gravity while basing on the flat Earth theory, a theory that was build around the premise that gravity isn't real in the first place
I would like you all to prove warping space and time using the scientific method
Im waiting
then please enlighten me @Arachidamia
Ping when you r rdy
@Citizen Z oohoo boy now that’s a good one okat
Okayokay
So
Proving gravity isn't as linear as you make it seem
You said you want the scientific method
Like
Hypothesis leading to a conclusion
Because your belliefs are against everything that gravity is set on
I’ll take that as a yes
So if you deny the existance of the bases you can't expect people to prove it
Okay so the hypothesis is that space and time can be warped
You can't expect people to build the second floor without the first
Or better yet our null hypothesis is that it cannot be
@Citizen Z Don't bother, he will give you a half-@ss scientific method then shift the burden of proof on you
Yes
Now going about this is *actually* easy
There is no proof for general relativity.
Its still a theory
Yes I’m claiming that it is actually easy this time
The warping of space and time is irrelevent when we are saying gravity is an acceleration of a force. That is a small detail that wouldnt effect the experiment to see if gravity exists
Ok einstein
But if he believes it unprovable he could tell us why and that way we can present why we believe it exists
Easy assuming you have a very fast jet and/or rocket
If it was provable it would be a law
There is no law of general relativity
Okay now if you have a friend
There is a law of gravity. Within a theory
he is saying it is unprovable to show that flat earth is a more likely model
But if he just believes it unprovable and leaves it to us to prove it without even telling us why he will always be able to say it's false