Message from @Arachidamia
Discord ID: 607043041609515028
it is mass
And also
problems with newtons gravity
You're not giving me an explanation of why gravity would work. You're just assuming gravity already exists
Let me read that I'll go back to you
k
Nothing productive of this came, globe earthers just burden proof all the time or appeal to authority like '' NEWTON GRAVITY ''
Yeah so then we can agree that general relativity is accurate then
I’m afraid you’re pulling your “burden of proof” shenanigans
You’re the one demanding scholarly articles at your beck and call
Newton gravity has problems that is pretty well known now
All you’ve done is ask for proof while providing nothing of your own
Not just no proof
You’ve not even made any points really
General relativity makes little to no sense
@Arachidamia Except the fact you were first proving me that gravity exist then told me why would it not exist? Congratulations, you have successfully derailed the convo. Why can't you prove it with the scientific method if it's that simple?
How so
I never said it was simple
:^)
rivenator12113#1610 LANGUAGE!!!
hmm invents something called spacetime then says it explains everything
???
Then don't say you can explain it with the scientific method if you can't explain it fully to the dot fool.
He didn’t “invent” spacetime
please do go on...lmao
He discovered a consistency in his observations
And coined a term for his theory which he went on to further observe
Collecting data as he went
take a ball, release it from your grip. The law of inertia states that it must stay in place for gravity not to exist, but it doesnt. It falls towards the ground.
If you would like to state that this is due to density, take the same ball, and drop it in a vacuum. The ball will display the same exact result.
Which consistently fell in line with his theory
yes but what is spacetime
rivenator12113#1610 LANGUAGE!!!
Seems like I wasted enough time, please message me something interesting when you find out that you can prove gravity with no idea how to finish them. I'm very open
The downward force that effects the ball is a phenomena named gravity.
It’s a phrase used to describe spatial dimensions and the precession of time as one unit that interacts
Actually. You are technically wrong. the ball will fall faster in vacuum do to the fact there is less resistance @CryingInGravity
My point is gravity plays a big part in the globe earth theory while it is totally ditched in the flat Earth theory
I want the scientific method @Arachidamia if you ever message me
@Citizen Z That’s a technicality that doesn’t matter at all in this scenario