Give me an irrefutable sound and valid premise with a conclusion or a scientific method article that explains it. Not that hard

Newton

Not an argument

If a sphere as big as earth sticks together then the water naturally would have stick to it as well?

I’m sure you follow that train of thought

Water is *part* of the sphere

Newton introduced the idea of gravity

it is mass

And also

https://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/users/gabor/black_holes/slide3.html

problems with newtons gravity

You're not giving me an explanation of why gravity would work. You're just assuming gravity already exists

Let me read that I'll go back to you

k

Nothing productive of this came, globe earthers just burden proof all the time or appeal to authority like '' NEWTON GRAVITY ''

Yeah so then we can agree that general relativity is accurate then

I’m afraid you’re pulling your “burden of proof” shenanigans

You’re the one demanding scholarly articles at your beck and call

Newton gravity has problems that is pretty well known now

All you’ve done is ask for proof while providing nothing of your own

Not just no proof

You’ve not even made any points really

General relativity makes little to no sense

@Arachidamia Except the fact you were first proving me that gravity exist then told me why would it not exist? Congratulations, you have successfully derailed the convo. Why can't you prove it with the scientific method if it's that simple?

How so

I never said it was simple

:^)

You’re putting words in my mouth

rivenator12113#1610 LANGUAGE!!!

hmm invents something called spacetime then says it explains everything

???

Then don't say you can explain it with the scientific method if you can't explain it fully to the dot fool.

He didn’t “invent” spacetime

please do go on...lmao

He discovered a consistency in his observations

And coined a term for his theory which he went on to further observe

Collecting data as he went

take a ball, release it from your grip. The law of inertia states that it must stay in place for gravity not to exist, but it doesnt. It falls towards the ground.
If you would like to state that this is due to density, take the same ball, and drop it in a vacuum. The ball will display the same exact result.

Which consistently fell in line with his theory

yes but what is spacetime

rivenator12113#1610 LANGUAGE!!!