Thank you so much! Yes, of course! Take care. Watch this when you can and comment back on. https://youtu.be/699h_U3ELOk This woman just glows esoteric!

I will! Talk soon!

Byee :)

@iZinoq wanna debate flat earth gravity?

@demonwarrior2266 idk

In....

14h?

why not now? @iZinoq

@demonwarrior2266 idk

Not in the md

😐

@demonwarrior2266 Gravity is likely a push-force.

@everyone, come debate me

In this channel

I can crush you in two sentences

@Bird-Finchine (UK, Wales) why do you think that?

@rivenator12113 do train tracks converge

@meep You need to research the definition of 'debate'.

@demonwarrior2266 No idea.

Debate denotation: a formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.

Debate connotation: reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Gravity is currently defined as the curvature of spacetime

the globe uses a twisted form of UA

@raspberry equivalence principle?

yeah universal acceleration is WAYYY better than density and buoyancy for flat earth. you saw 97. anyone can debate and debunk density and buoyancy, but it literally took an undergrad to beat UA (or atleast 97's version)

@demonwarrior2266 getting warmer (; but the equivalence principle only holds approximately and locally

in true GR, there is only one 4d interpretation, and it's that the earth's surface accelerates, in all frames, to meet the non-changing paths of freely falling objects

it accelerates up and out

and 97's UA wasn't defeated, idk why 97 is acting like it was

we got the new idea of the event horizon for 97's model. new idea =/= suddenly defeated

but ye we can agree density and buoyancy are no explanation lol

@raspberry 97 did give up so i think we can both count it a win for shadow, whether 97's ua was actually destroyed or not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

for the debate i can accept that :p i just don't count 97's idea itself as lost

Too be honest the Rindler Horizon point didn't seem that horrendous to me

F.E kinda needs a completely different universe all together anyways

xd

As to the proposed mechanism of acceleration I'm sure it was just crap

can it be worse than dark energy?

I'm willing to debate any subject as long as it's intresting

earth is a globe
belief in any supernatural is irational
Such as ghosts, god(s), and spiritualism
gays are ok
Today's feminism is cancer
abortion is highly debatable for me, Mostly where the line should be
your gender is unimportant and is not worth a pronoun

Things I can debate