Message from @Friedrich Myth
Discord ID: 612351189174190080
Good luck, I'm sure you'll get there! I can certainly see the difference.
Plushie, my wife is demanding my attention back to her instead of my phone, so I have to leave for now Haha.
Thank you so much! Yes, of course! Take care. Watch this when you can and comment back on. https://youtu.be/699h_U3ELOk This woman just glows esoteric!
I will! Talk soon!
Byee :)
@iZinoq wanna debate flat earth gravity?
In....
14h?
why not now? @iZinoq
Not in the md
😐
@demonwarrior2266 Gravity is likely a push-force.
@everyone, come debate me
In this channel
I can crush you in two sentences
@Bird-Finchine (UK, Wales) why do you think that?
@rivenator12113 do train tracks converge
@meep You need to research the definition of 'debate'.
@demonwarrior2266 No idea.
Debate denotation: a formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.
Debate connotation: reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Gravity is currently defined as the curvature of spacetime
the globe uses a twisted form of UA
@raspberry equivalence principle?
yeah universal acceleration is WAYYY better than density and buoyancy for flat earth. you saw 97. anyone can debate and debunk density and buoyancy, but it literally took an undergrad to beat UA (or atleast 97's version)
@demonwarrior2266 getting warmer (; but the equivalence principle only holds approximately and locally
in true GR, there is only one 4d interpretation, and it's that the earth's surface accelerates, in all frames, to meet the non-changing paths of freely falling objects
it accelerates up and out
and 97's UA wasn't defeated, idk why 97 is acting like it was
we got the new idea of the event horizon for 97's model. new idea =/= suddenly defeated
but ye we can agree density and buoyancy are no explanation lol
@raspberry 97 did give up so i think we can both count it a win for shadow, whether 97's ua was actually destroyed or not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
for the debate i can accept that :p i just don't count 97's idea itself as lost
Too be honest the Rindler Horizon point didn't seem that horrendous to me
F.E kinda needs a completely different universe all together anyways
xd
As to the proposed mechanism of acceleration I'm sure it was just crap
can it be worse than dark energy?
I'm willing to debate any subject as long as it's intresting
earth is a globe
belief in any supernatural is irational
Such as ghosts, god(s), and spiritualism
gays are ok
Today's feminism is cancer
abortion is highly debatable for me, Mostly where the line should be
your gender is unimportant and is not worth a pronoun