Dang ive been trying to get verified so long

Shouldn't have to try

https://youtu.be/5jYSvKVy_Vk

the protene argument

@raspberry no i mean how if you shoot a beam of light through a slit and make it more and more narrow, the beam on the wall gets more and more narrow as well, up until a point, when the light actually starts to spread out because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle

@demonwarrior2266 hmm I haven't heard about that point? I don't think there's any sharp cutoff. And without quantum measurement, the uncertainty principle is basically just classical wave mechanics

The beam on the wall does get smaller then larger, but without any cutoff given by a quantum uncertainty principle

It can be described just as a classical wave

9-11 was aerosmith requiems doing <#604872933751521281>

@raspberry aw i thought that counted 😔

@demonwarrior2266 it iss like the uncertainty principle but, just the classical wave version of it .-.

so nu it doesn't prove quantum stuff

so it is a classical version ;c

FAK

x_X

if the earth is flat, with the north pole being at the centre of it and the south pole stretching around the exterior... how is nasa or wtv other alliance supposed to maintain constant military presence everywhere in Antarctica?

Antarctic treaty is bound by over 50 countries

Their militaries have held this agreement within wars and conflicts

The only one of its kind

supposing that the earth really is flat and Antarctica stretches around the exterior of the disc.
knowing that the radius of the equator is about 6378km and that the equator is equidistant from both poles, then Antarctica's radius is about 12756km, making its circumference just under 80150km (which is wrong)
that means constant military presence along 80000km?

👁 👄 👁

When war-ing countries waste 90% of all their troops placing them on the frigid impossible to live ice border

seems legit

I want a citation on that stuff

what stuff?

The countries all sharing a treaty through war that makes them all defend the 80,150 km coastline

oh lol

yeah, that'd be great

Once you get me any legitimate citation ill believe it but i find that incredibly unlikely

yeah... 80000km is quite the distance....

that's what? like 50000 miles give or take?

They have bases all over Antarctica

All of them are highly classified

But there is evidence of their existance

Yet no information about the amount of soldiers there, just the fact that there is a global military presence

Can you even give me which 50 countries are there? I bet you wont find a source on that

And im talking millitary bases not reaearch bases

how many bases to cover 80000km

the 'military basses' in Antarctica are counted at "research faculties" as you are not allowed to have a military presence in Antarctica, but the US uses their military planes and troops to resupply the research faculties .

No military has any ships stationed to watch the borders of Antarctica.....

so you dont think any kind of monitoring systems exist and that you can just go wherever you want without a bother?