Message from @Haise

Discord ID: 620025284498030602


2019-09-07 03:26:54 UTC  

light waves don't work

2019-09-07 03:27:03 UTC  

just pop some electrons through one at a time

2019-09-07 03:29:34 UTC  

light waves and electrons behave the same way

2019-09-07 03:29:37 UTC  

according to qm

2019-09-07 03:30:11 UTC  

but, when's the last time you popped electrons into a slit one at a time? xD @racecartacocat

2019-09-07 03:50:52 UTC  

idk there was some experiment I haven't looked into it in like 2 years tbh so

2019-09-07 03:51:01 UTC  

not really an expert

2019-09-07 04:37:07 UTC  

oh ye np @racecartacocat my only point was we probably can't do it for ourselves

2019-09-07 04:37:40 UTC  

yeah you need advanced lab equipment but I think it's been done, again can't verify where I saw that

2019-09-07 04:38:05 UTC  

oh i got mainstream verified nice

2019-09-07 04:38:10 UTC  

now im a big boi globe earther

2019-09-07 04:40:08 UTC  

yee nice

2019-09-07 05:47:23 UTC  

Dang ive been trying to get verified so long

2019-09-07 05:49:13 UTC  

Shouldn't have to try

2019-09-07 07:41:34 UTC  
2019-09-07 07:41:40 UTC  

the protene argument

2019-09-07 14:30:41 UTC  

@raspberry no i mean how if you shoot a beam of light through a slit and make it more and more narrow, the beam on the wall gets more and more narrow as well, up until a point, when the light actually starts to spread out because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle

2019-09-07 22:09:40 UTC  

@demonwarrior2266 hmm I haven't heard about that point? I don't think there's any sharp cutoff. And without quantum measurement, the uncertainty principle is basically just classical wave mechanics

2019-09-07 22:12:10 UTC  

The beam on the wall does get smaller then larger, but without any cutoff given by a quantum uncertainty principle

2019-09-07 22:13:25 UTC  

It can be described just as a classical wave

2019-09-07 22:39:07 UTC  

9-11 was aerosmith requiems doing <#604872933751521281>

2019-09-08 16:47:56 UTC  

@raspberry aw i thought that counted 😔

2019-09-08 16:52:45 UTC  

@demonwarrior2266 it iss like the uncertainty principle but, just the classical wave version of it .-.

2019-09-08 16:54:41 UTC  

so nu it doesn't prove quantum stuff

2019-09-08 17:05:41 UTC  

so it is a classical version ;c

2019-09-08 17:05:50 UTC  

FAK

2019-09-08 17:06:19 UTC  

x_X

2019-09-09 03:25:31 UTC  

if the earth is flat, with the north pole being at the centre of it and the south pole stretching around the exterior... how is nasa or wtv other alliance supposed to maintain constant military presence everywhere in Antarctica?

2019-09-09 03:33:47 UTC  

Antarctic treaty is bound by over 50 countries

2019-09-09 03:34:29 UTC  

Their militaries have held this agreement within wars and conflicts

2019-09-09 03:34:59 UTC  

The only one of its kind

2019-09-09 03:40:31 UTC  

supposing that the earth really is flat and Antarctica stretches around the exterior of the disc.
knowing that the radius of the equator is about 6378km and that the equator is equidistant from both poles, then Antarctica's radius is about 12756km, making its circumference just under 80150km (which is wrong)
that means constant military presence along 80000km?

2019-09-09 03:45:50 UTC  

👁 👄 👁

2019-09-09 03:49:43 UTC  

When war-ing countries waste 90% of all their troops placing them on the frigid impossible to live ice border

2019-09-09 03:50:22 UTC  

seems legit

2019-09-09 03:50:35 UTC  

I want a citation on that stuff

2019-09-09 03:50:49 UTC  

what stuff?

2019-09-09 03:51:49 UTC  

The countries all sharing a treaty through war that makes them all defend the 80,150 km coastline

2019-09-09 03:51:56 UTC  

oh lol

2019-09-09 03:52:06 UTC  

yeah, that'd be great

2019-09-09 03:54:47 UTC  

Once you get me any legitimate citation ill believe it but i find that incredibly unlikely