Go make one..see what happens

Not everything can be replicated at home...just because you can't remake it as an amateur in the field doesn't mean you can deny it. You can't build a skyscraper. Let's say you live in a rural area and have never been to the city and only seen pictures of them. That doesn't make them fake, or give you a reason to deny their existence.

Skyscrapers are really incredible structures and require many, many smart engineers to build. No one can replicate such a structure without the help of professionals and a millions of dollars- budget...they also require government approval to build.

But we both know that skyscrapers exist...right?

There was a fellow that I saw. He made videos conspiring about airplanes. He said that the airplanes you see in the sky are actually 'sky demons'. They supposedly disguise themselves as airplanes and patrol the skies overhead. His proof? He took zoomed in photographs of airplanes, and since the resolution was so low, some features didn't appear as they do on a normal plane. He then concluded that it was because the plane was a fake. This is an extreme case, but it adds to my point.

!mute @oƃǝW

Skyscrapers are real so that means nukes are real

Look at these pictures

Real. Cuz photo

Thank you for unmuting me.

Yes

While faries wouldn't be physically possible in the form that they're usually found on TV, unicorns might be. Genetic modification could at some point become advanced enough that we could splice horse genes with narwhal genes and make them grow a horn on their head...

If we couldn't take pictures of things, the world would be a very different place. Flat earthers rely on video as well as literary evidence for all of their proof - as does the entire world. Because fake pictures exist, it doesn't give you a license to call any picture evidence you see as fake.

A more accurate usage of the term 'fake picture' would be, an unverifiable picture. A picture of a mermaid on a unicorn is not verifiable evidence for their existence in reality, not because of the picture being fake necessarily, but because we know that they are biologically impossible creatures. An image of a skycraper is a verifiable picture because one can go to that location and confirm it themselves. Just the way images of nukes are verifiable because they were confirmed to be observed by verifiable sources, AKA, real people. However, nuke deniers would have to attack the credibiiltiy of the witnesses in order to be able to deny their existence - that still doesn't make images and video of nukes inherently fake, or comparable to images of unicorns.

Its about the credibility of the people who witnessed and created them. Also, aren't you drawing a conclusion before actually testing the evidence in this scenario? Before you have actually talked to scientists, studied nukes and seen them for yourself, you have decided that the images are fake. What if you encountered someone who claims to have built a nuke? Would the conclusion about them being fake already determine your opinion of that person?

I hope not.

Unicorns pics

https://twitter.com/i/status/1183163985584984064

How can earth be flat when it measures to be a sphere

show measurement

So, why do space programs publicly launch spacecraft if they can't go into orbit? Where do they go? Why spend billions to create something that ultimately does nothing?

Also, why create the entirety of Rocket Science just to explain where these rockets go? Wouldn't it just be easier to say "We do definitely launch them with engines and stuff", but not give us specifics and say "We launch them in private for.. reasons."?

Why say we have the technology at all?

Indeed

What are you typing on right now then? XD

I think you misunderstood the question

Perhaps, but everything is a form of technology, from crude tools to computers.

He is not arguing that point, he is asking why nasa would admit having the technology to go into space

At least that is how i read ut

So they can keep the lie going?

Why even lie in the first place

CM you are round earther and christian that is not possible

the bible says it's flat

Because if the Earth was widely found out to be flat, NASA and pretty much all the world's governments would lose tremendous power.

basically yeah

and probably it has more than one purpose

Why

Why would they lose power

good question