hello everyone!

you were asking what quarks and other subatomic particles are made of because we know that they appear and disappear, pull information from nowhere, etc, right? @ShyGuyfromUpHigh

we know quantum mechanics as a very odd and nonsensical science

double sit experiment, heisenberg's uncertainty principle, etc.

I don't have an argument right now, im neutral to both sides of the simulated universe theory

im just saying what I know

the way subatomic particles behave doesn't make much sense when it comes to the physics we know. Im not trying to poke holes in quantum mechanics

that's not true. i think there is a beauty in being the only creatures in a massive universe. just because the world out there is huge doesn't mean we're insignificant.

all Im saying is that they act strangely

i dont know much aside from the basics

i feel like you're trying to make an argument, but i dont really know what it's about

ah yeah, i was just trying to take the place of the other person because they seemed unwilling to discuss the topic

there was a quote...something about if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't

lmao

!join

DEJA VU

euro beat

no shame in anime with subs @Matt77

that's a false analogy, because if you watch raw, you're nothing short of a god @Matt77

so you pretty much know everything

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

if the object is moving away

it redshifts

if its moving closer it uuuh

blueshifts or something

because light is made out of nonliving things

🚶

light acts as a wave and then it decides to act like a particle. make up your damn mind

smh

wait

as a flat earther do you believe at all in subatomic particles? @Umwhat

or particles at all?

quantum mechanics and astrophysics cross over a lot

if you reject one you're likely to reject the other

why would you reject all science?

o

i see

interpretations or theories? 🤔

well

according to science its pretty curvy

just take up a curve calculator

take into account atmospheric refraction

and take some pictures

EZ

can you give an example?

huh, I thought flat space was already accepted by most scientists

yeah

no

waig

wait

really?
'

i didn't think that analogy worked

but oh well

yeah, tis flat

we're flat spacers

the existence of dark energy gives an even higher likeliness of it being flat

that really warps my mind

how flat the universe had to be when it was small in order for it to still be flat now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blSTTFS8Uco&t=684s

they're just called that way because they eat up all the light that comes their way

they look like a 'black hole'

in space

whoa

why *are* black holes round?

🚶

well

i dont think sunrazor is making up theories on the spot

he's referencing them

he makes it clear when he is speculating

Snell's law

a law stating that the ratio of the sines of the angles of incidence and refraction of a wave are constant when it passes between two given media.

everyone has their own ideas and biases

there's always something that we don't know about...curiosity will drive us to make our own conclusions about what those unknown things are

the second most passive aggressive message you can send

second to 'k'

k

wait what's your theory here?

gravity being a gradient? that's...interesting

i find it interesting that you guys are giggling and laughing at 'globe earthers', for leaving the vc, claiming that the person left because they didnt have evidence - something which you cant confirm yourselves. when, funny enough, flat earthers dont have a working map or any map that accurately reflects reality either, so i dont see whats so funny @Spectranaut

it just came off as really abrasive to me

I always viewed gravity this way...fabric of spacetime, gravity is a sort of distortion caused by large objects in spacetime, and it pulls stuff in, etc. @SunRazor

@Logrian that balloon pioneers image you posted...why are you commenting about NASA using cgi in regards to it?

its just an image of the sky

people knew what the sky looked like back then

anyone would know that image wasnt real

can you send the source of that image

ok so i found out that in the flat earth model the sun is 'local' and goes around the flat earth in a circle. in order for it to move sooo far in only 24 hours it would have to be moving at 1000+ mph

with the sun being local, why doesnt it leave some sort of trail behind it?

because its colliding with particles in the atmosphere

it is also giving off light isnt it

idk what you guys think its made of

but if you look at anything traveling that fast in the atmosphere it usually leaves a trail of some sort

atmosphere meaning inside of the dome right?

the maps im looking at

thats strange because everywhere i go flat earthers tell me different things

i wish theyd give me consistent ideas

Gravity did not create the universe.

Gravity is a force that increases in strength the larger an object is. The effects of my gravity and someone else's are not strong enough to overcome other forces.

However, on a large scale, gravity is an incredibly strong force - strong enough to hold superclusters of galaxies together.

Gravity also works differently on interplanetary scales than you might think. The reason why planets don't get locked in place around a star and instead move around them, is because gravity is causing the planet to constantly fall towards the star. However, the planet will miss the star every time. This causes a circular orbit.

Its the same reason why satellites orbit the earth the way they do