I made the claim that focal length changes the relative size of the objects

and I provedthat

I have proven my claim, so you can stop with the strawman

And actually debate properly

Rather than running scared

10 minutes to show proof of different different focal length used go. I

k

12:50

well have fun with your strawman

all i said was it depends on focal length and i proved that

Go ahead and evade dealing with the fact that you've been proven wrong

I didn't strawman, you said it was due to different focal length. I asked for evidence to the 2 different focal length used, the burden of proof now lies on you.

Strawman

I never said that

I said it depends on focal length

And I proved that

Now you said focal length CANT explalin this

lets see yoru proof, you have 3 minutes

Are you not going to show proof for your explanation?

Lol @everyone look at the flerfer in cog dis, and strawmanning

My only interjection (if that's the right word) is that for the picture to be possible, you'd need to have the camera positioned significantly farther than the moon, and you'd need a depth of field (DOF) that is deep enough to fit both the Earth and the Moon.

http://i.imgur.com/kzCj0.gif

proof of my explanation

I guess that's a no?

Is the only way someone can be a flat earther is to be willingly blind?

!mute @BallsOutScience

uh oh

I don't have a problem with faulty arguments, I do have a problem with attacks.

yep, I saw that

I spent $1000 on furniture stuff and uphosteries

I can't bring in used furniture without a thorough inspection for bed bugs

OMFG, wrong chat

@rivenator12113 damn you got rekt by that guy

he proved focal length and you could do nothing but mute him for proving you wrong?

how is that civil debate?

!mute @Rivetor

@Rivetor he got muted for attacking character (the person) rather than attacking the position

is it easier to make an account or mute? 🤔

I think that depends on if the person is using a VPN