THe size of the earth in the background

he said it's impossible

I showed how it's very possible due to a focal length difference

But now he's moving the goal post

Provide evidence that they had different focal length as you stated earlier. If you can't please don't come up with an assumption that you can't back up with evidence.

@BallsOutScience I would argue that it's not so much due to different focal lengths, but rather angular field of view.

All i said was focal length can make this happen

Do you deny that

And that's just based on my experience of working with some cameras.

I never said i knew the focal lengths

@SunRazor focal length and angular field of view are related intimately

@BallsOutScience You have 10 minutes to find the 2 different focal length used as you said. If you can't, I won't be wasting my time on bla bla talk with no productivity. 0 evidence = your debunking is futile

@rivenator12113 you made the claim taht focal length CANt make this happen

so now you have to prove that

I made the claim that focal length changes the relative size of the objects

and I provedthat

I have proven my claim, so you can stop with the strawman

And actually debate properly

Rather than running scared

10 minutes to show proof of different different focal length used go. I

k

12:50

well have fun with your strawman

all i said was it depends on focal length and i proved that

Go ahead and evade dealing with the fact that you've been proven wrong

I didn't strawman, you said it was due to different focal length. I asked for evidence to the 2 different focal length used, the burden of proof now lies on you.

Strawman

I never said that

I said it depends on focal length

And I proved that

Now you said focal length CANT explalin this

lets see yoru proof, you have 3 minutes

Are you not going to show proof for your explanation?

Lol @everyone look at the flerfer in cog dis, and strawmanning

My only interjection (if that's the right word) is that for the picture to be possible, you'd need to have the camera positioned significantly farther than the moon, and you'd need a depth of field (DOF) that is deep enough to fit both the Earth and the Moon.

http://i.imgur.com/kzCj0.gif

proof of my explanation

I guess that's a no?

Is the only way someone can be a flat earther is to be willingly blind?

!mute @BallsOutScience