plenty of awesome science to be done on the moon

i mean technically doing anything is a waste of resources

It's already happened

Civilians have gone to the ISS, with the russians

well technically you can

It's just really expensive

And you have to be fit, smart, etc.

RUssians take money to do this

So you're wrong

ISS is not the mid atmosphere

it's definitely in space

Wrong

Plenty have, through Russia

Russia is

@Skeptic Ayy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_tourism

During the period from 2001 to 2009, 7 space tourists made 8 space flights aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft brokered by Space Adventures to the International Space Station. T

"Space Adventures"

K

well do some more research then

Maybe then you'll arrive at a more accurate understanding

@Skeptic Ayy selected ppl from NASA?

100% wrong

No but there was

until recently

and nasa is going to start again

Doesn't change the fact that plenty of ppl have gone to the ISS

do you mean with human missions, or just in general?

b/c i disagree

seismology, far-side radio astronomy, and landing at the permanently shadowed areas which have valuable state of evidence

or just become an astronaut or cosmonaut

through russia, america or other countries

Ya so what nasa is the american space agency

who else would select their astronauts

besides italy and germany, UK have astronauts

not selected by nasa

ya that's just not true

Russia used to

Ya?

show me the economics that makes you say that

and the physics and technologies that would make that happen

I think it's funny when ppl criticize nasa for wasting money, then criticize them for saving money by sending unmanned missions instead of humans

@Skeptic Ayy is POEing

but they brought back moon rocks

how are those faked

"destroyed all the data"

100% wrong

lol he dropped a feather and a hammer, and they fell at 1/6 g at the same exact rate

I can talk about rocket science

delta V = Ve ln(Mf/Me)

awesome

@Skeptic Ayy we do, what are you struggling with

@everyone wanna see something hilarious

pffffft

the guy lied about getting gifted a rock?

"dozen caught"

lol, ever conspiracy BS relied on misreading information

because of confirmation bias

"that video is fake" because it MUST be fake to a conspiratard, in order for their wacky view to work

thank you science

Lol nasa's awesome they can delete laws of physics

@Skeptic Ayy lets test your standard of logic

is there any evidence men landed on the moon?

fuckin terrorists

Hmm

yet the grid is so reliable we don't think about it

@rivenator12113 why do you say that

k

and?

why

Yes what does that image suggest to you

k

but it depends on the focal length of the camera

the lens actually

https://media.giphy.com/media/l2JJu55Y2LSvkbBqo/giphy.gif

yes, you don't appear to understand focal length and photography

http://i.imgur.com/kzCj0.gif

No i'd have to go look them up

I bet they're different

K

But no matter what, your statemetn that it's impossible to look that way, is wrong

becasue now you know that focal length changes the relative size of the foreground and back ground

@rivenator12113 This is on topic

you made a statement that those two images prove one is faked

but I showed you how this can be a simple difference in focal length

So your original statement is bunk

I did prove it

I showed how this effect happens at different focal lengths

I don't have to look up the numbers to show that what you originally said was wrong

about the relative sizes of the earth and moon

Now that your original statement is wrong, are you still defending it?

Ya it is, as demonstrated by the gif

THe size of the earth in the background

he said it's impossible

I showed how it's very possible due to a focal length difference

But now he's moving the goal post

All i said was focal length can make this happen

Do you deny that

I never said i knew the focal lengths

@SunRazor focal length and angular field of view are related intimately

@rivenator12113 you made the claim taht focal length CANt make this happen