i think now they are trying to claim their is a coriolis gradient lol

wait wut

assertions warrant burden of proof

its obviously not just because you dont understand

Hey

I got a question for i jeremy

If u can answer it correctly i accept ur claim, that u understand the corriolis effect very well

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/441700127699370025/634564584337834004/fcshare-FUxmoHY3.gif

@jeremy

Hi

I just now got another claim that the frames of reference aren’t real lol

Ofc there not there imaginary constructs

Lol

Anyway u can show that u u derstand coriolis by answering my question correctly

?

If u shoot a bullet from 1 mile below aequator to a target 3 miles north what is supposed to happen to the path of the bullet according to coriolis effect?

Its for jeremy fe

No one can shoot a bullet like that and expect the same result twice in a row

what r the reference frames for ur example

Not reality.

Ur question indicates that u dont understand the coriolis effect mate

u want to know what they claim ?

Its a simple question to answer with all informations needed given

Yes

they claim the bullet deviates

How deviates in this example

realistically its not becuase of coriolis

The path of the bullet to be precise

there was a sniper in here a couple days ago he said he only accounts for curvature of earth and not coriolis

Just answer plz

he accounts for earth curve lol

Ur trying to distract plz answer if ur able to

they say the earth is spinning under the bullet so it deviates

Incorrect and not precise enough either

every lattitude

I want u telling me how it deviates

the bullet enters the earths spinning different speeds

i know the nonsense claim

its ridiculous

Yes and that causes?

?