i just wanna hear the frames for this pendulum nonsense

i see...

they are a professional glober

well idk about professional lol but i heard them on nathan before

ok

they explained the reference frames for the pendulums on voice chat but it was hard to hear i was at work

something about the distance from the radius between the 2 pendulums idk i asked for them in pm but they gave the roundabout frames

it doesnt sound like it makes sense to me

they told me i didnt understand reference frames so im suspicious

the usual

the coriolis effect happens with one thing and 2 reference frames not 2 things in different locations

on th e same reference frame attached to earth

not on the

i think now they are trying to claim their is a coriolis gradient lol

wait wut

assertions warrant burden of proof

its obviously not just because you dont understand

Hey

I got a question for i jeremy

If u can answer it correctly i accept ur claim, that u understand the corriolis effect very well

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/441700127699370025/634564584337834004/fcshare-FUxmoHY3.gif

@jeremy

Hi

I just now got another claim that the frames of reference aren’t real lol

Ofc there not there imaginary constructs

Lol

Anyway u can show that u u derstand coriolis by answering my question correctly

?

If u shoot a bullet from 1 mile below aequator to a target 3 miles north what is supposed to happen to the path of the bullet according to coriolis effect?

Its for jeremy fe

No one can shoot a bullet like that and expect the same result twice in a row

what r the reference frames for ur example

Not reality.

Ur question indicates that u dont understand the coriolis effect mate

u want to know what they claim ?

Its a simple question to answer with all informations needed given

Yes

they claim the bullet deviates

How deviates in this example

realistically its not becuase of coriolis

The path of the bullet to be precise