i asked them for the reference frames they gave me reference frames for a roundabout though instead

u wanna hear this one

inner edge and outer edge are the frames

idk which one was which they didnt specify

i just wanna hear the frames for this pendulum nonsense

i see...

they are a professional glober

well idk about professional lol but i heard them on nathan before

ok

they explained the reference frames for the pendulums on voice chat but it was hard to hear i was at work

something about the distance from the radius between the 2 pendulums idk i asked for them in pm but they gave the roundabout frames

it doesnt sound like it makes sense to me

they told me i didnt understand reference frames so im suspicious

the usual

the coriolis effect happens with one thing and 2 reference frames not 2 things in different locations

on th e same reference frame attached to earth

not on the

i think now they are trying to claim their is a coriolis gradient lol

wait wut

assertions warrant burden of proof

its obviously not just because you dont understand

Hey

I got a question for i jeremy

If u can answer it correctly i accept ur claim, that u understand the corriolis effect very well

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/441700127699370025/634564584337834004/fcshare-FUxmoHY3.gif

@jeremy

Hi

I just now got another claim that the frames of reference aren’t real lol

Ofc there not there imaginary constructs

Lol

Anyway u can show that u u derstand coriolis by answering my question correctly

?

If u shoot a bullet from 1 mile below aequator to a target 3 miles north what is supposed to happen to the path of the bullet according to coriolis effect?

Its for jeremy fe

No one can shoot a bullet like that and expect the same result twice in a row

what r the reference frames for ur example

Not reality.

Ur question indicates that u dont understand the coriolis effect mate

u want to know what they claim ?

Its a simple question to answer with all informations needed given

Yes