Message from @KeithG57
Discord ID: 466993207557750824
there gonna get him on changing the context of changing negligence to intent.. that was bias..he used judgement on what Hillary did..
is there something other than human souces??
protection in a trash compactor?
The snakes are being charmed
I think disolving the FBI would require congressional vote,though
You have gained a rank @Pawhuska, you just advanced to 20 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!
Cummings: you weren't able to answer because of the longstanding policy of not revealing confidential human sources... is that right?
Strzok: [yeah, sure]
human source...is there inhuman sources ? alien sources ?? animal sources ?
this is what true mafia look slike
MD Rep: clarifies the context of the question in question
[no really]
AI vs human
Strzok: people who come to the FBI as sources put their lives in the hands of the FBI
risk of being arkancided
Strzok: no matter where those sources come from... Beijing, Moscow ... they won't come forward if we can't protect them
👉 Humans
Convincing is easy to speak...truth is not....the guilty are comfortable with convincing
cummings has been coached !!
Cummings conflates Weiner laptop with investigation with HRC's email server [again0
Dem's = we gotta keep everything SECRET
If it was not a "Human Source" ..................WTH
Previously rehearsed
how about protecting the trash compactor?
shall I stop? sorry
dont stop.
Please go on
[it helps me digest it]
I think the mistake here is trying to prove INTENT on the basis of a "late night text" . . . . "INTENT is notoriously hard to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" . . . .to prove that STROCK KNEW he had a dubious attitude to the future POTUS is STILL CRIMINAL, and FAR EASIER TO PROVE
Strzok: hostile foreign power influencing the outcomes of an American Presidential election weighed heavily [ignores how he was guilty of same]
like Soros?
like a dick heading towards his mouth
We have a gif for a good meme
