Message from @81428
Discord ID: 466993728020545565
Strzok: no matter where those sources come from... Beijing, Moscow ... they won't come forward if we can't protect them
π Humans
Convincing is easy to speak...truth is not....the guilty are comfortable with convincing
cummings has been coached !!
leading
Cummings conflates Weiner laptop with investigation with HRC's email server [again0
Dem's = we gotta keep everything SECRET
If it was not a "Human Source" ..................WTH
Previously rehearsed
how about protecting the trash compactor?
shall I stop? sorry
dont stop.
Please go on
[it helps me digest it]
I think the mistake here is trying to prove INTENT on the basis of a "late night text" . . . . "INTENT is notoriously hard to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" . . . .to prove that STROCK KNEW he had a dubious attitude to the future POTUS is STILL CRIMINAL, and FAR EASIER TO PROVE
Strzok: hostile foreign power influencing the outcomes of an American Presidential election weighed heavily [ignores how he was guilty of same]
like a dick heading towards his mouth
We have a gif for a good meme
Strzok wonders aloud about foreign powers being installed in institutions... conjecture all over the place... Cummings and his exchange seems rehearsed
Why is he answering these baited questions.......but not the others? π€
[needs facts not conjecture]
is lisa paige at th hearing????
Looks like strzck is gonna weasel thru this
@trusty rusty β because they were rehearsed
Cummings just wasted 5 minutes
Goodlatte: Does the FBI usually make recommendations on prosecutions far ahead of conclusions of investigation?
@MrT I was hoping one of you Patriots would make some for me to appropriate! π Oh, and arenβt the other faces telling?
Strzok: investigators will often form an opinion early on
Even Cummings knows...
opining
Goodlatte: how often do you opine about the result so far in advance of an investigation?
Strzok prevaricates