@Deleted User delete the post right quick

Shat on by bobbo

Markus tried framing racemixing like it's evil, but Nick said there is NOTHING inherently immoral with it

@Broseph literally focusin on the first few words of a long take

@Deleted User delete the tyrone im preg post

hurry

Imagine grasping this much to defend race mixing

Wow

You're only focusing on the last part

@Metaphysical Monarchist the same defence they offered for their degeneracy is the same thing pedos will use

Lol the last 3 minutes as opposed to the first 30 seconds

Marcus got btfo'd by Nick himself <:lmaoJUST:402622080719519744>

He talked about the outcome which can be wrong, and why take the chance with a bad outcome, but he started by saying that the act itself is not immoral

@Deleted User

You are wrong

Get BTFO markus

He literally said it brings a lot of unnecessary problems and it should be avoided. lmao

@Deleted User lmaooooo

He also said the act in and of itself isnt wrong but aight white boy

That means i can get the white women

I will fuck all of the Jewish women I want fag

every thing brings problems

Keep coping

cant stop me

I will fuck all of the Jewish women I want fag

You literally say the act is wrong, he said the consequences are wrong, not the act itself. It isn't INHERENTLY wrong

haveing pure white children brings problems

I will fuck all of the Jewish women I want fag

"the consequences of being a faggot are wrong but being a faggot isn't wrong" lmao

Imagine being so retarded you can't tell the difference between an act and an outcome

If the act is wrong so is the consequence , what kinda logic are you guys using in here ????

I can fuck whitey

Civ nat faggots exposed

Being a fag is a sin, racemixing isn't

like Nick said , not inherently bad, but the consequences associated with it should be considered

brainlet everything

@Marcus Antonius so ur calling nick a civnat huh <:smug:402400327313391616>

I was vindicated about rallies tonight

@Jbruh I agree, markus doesn't