Message from @foilhat
Discord ID: 464481734927581194
lol
@Jayde yes.. about 3 hrs
impressive
all I need lately
haha
lol I bow in inferiority
Ivanka Trump
Verified account
@IvankaTrump
3h3 hours ago
More Ivanka Trump Retweeted Hannah Ojo
Thank you Blessing for your courageous and dedicated work to #EndTrafficking. You are an inspiration to us all!
Keep fighting! We are with you. @JTIP_State @SecPompeo
`on a war path`
Antifa should show their faces and stop being cowards.
'Trump Baby' balloon gets green light from London mayor @CNNI https://cnn.it/2zfmNmo
That would be a good sight @**Åli̊čeȰn✨Q̣̇✨**
Forget MSM, trump is welcome in the uk. And he will notice that on the 14th
Tend to question stories that are based on leaks, news stories, apparently, mixed
I get my news from the people on the ground
me too
Giant Flying Roaches
KipperCentral has a decent article about Tommy
oh good
Check out @Thomas1774Paine’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1014922935096741888?s=09
lol
red wave
@Neilo Hi, I'm a student at Lee @Stranahan CJS 'Citizens Journalism School' & I'll let you in on (my) one particular point-of-view on Stranahan. He's Verdently Rooted in Facts Only Reporting. He teaches & ascribes to not talk from Opinion or Supposition.
I can understand Stranahans POV... knowing about his Stringent Facts Based Reporting...that he feels Questionable about Q until later he can find fact. That's his periogative.
Funny I watched YouTube video yesterday from Jason Goodman interviewing Corsi & Stranahan about Awan Hearing...I thought I heard Stranahan reference Qs pov, being a positive reference. Saying that...(if I did recall that accurately) it's possible Doc C. may have layed his negative diabitribe (we know only to well about) about the Q movement (that shocked many of us) as he basically flipped his stance on Q back stabbing (us) Patriots here!
I'd give Stranahan space to digest this over time. How can he or anyone definitively claim Q is fake or not, being Anonymous.
Know one knows who Q is, as of now for sure. It takes time to digest Qs criptic messages & research to get a better handle on Q proofs.
I wouldn't be surprised in time if Lees position might change, yet his focus on Fact Based Journalism leads me to think I can see why he may remain skeptical.
Lees adamant statement if true that Q is a fake is a bit deterred from a fact vs. supposition stance.
To me how can one claim fake if know one actually knows who Q is???
In my Opinion.
Second parts