Message from @gavin giant
Discord ID: 464481562893877248
They will scuttle that boat, so you might as well give them a hand with a few .50 cal rounds in it. @Deleted User
sleep well @Jayde ?
@ʙɪɴᴀʀʏ ᴀɢᴇɴᴛ🐉🦋 yes, did you even sleep
lol
@Jayde yes.. about 3 hrs
impressive
all I need lately
haha
lol I bow in inferiority
Ivanka Trump
Verified account
@IvankaTrump
3h3 hours ago
More Ivanka Trump Retweeted Hannah Ojo
Thank you Blessing for your courageous and dedicated work to #EndTrafficking. You are an inspiration to us all!
Keep fighting! We are with you. @JTIP_State @SecPompeo
`on a war path`
Antifa should show their faces and stop being cowards.
'Trump Baby' balloon gets green light from London mayor @CNNI https://cnn.it/2zfmNmo
That would be a good sight @**Åli̊čeȰn✨Q̣̇✨**
Forget MSM, trump is welcome in the uk. And he will notice that on the 14th
Tend to question stories that are based on leaks, news stories, apparently, mixed
me too
Giant Flying Roaches
not getting much from Tommy atm
KipperCentral has a decent article about Tommy
oh good
Check out @Thomas1774Paine’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1014922935096741888?s=09
lol
red wave
@Neilo Hi, I'm a student at Lee @Stranahan CJS 'Citizens Journalism School' & I'll let you in on (my) one particular point-of-view on Stranahan. He's Verdently Rooted in Facts Only Reporting. He teaches & ascribes to not talk from Opinion or Supposition.
I can understand Stranahans POV... knowing about his Stringent Facts Based Reporting...that he feels Questionable about Q until later he can find fact. That's his periogative.
Funny I watched YouTube video yesterday from Jason Goodman interviewing Corsi & Stranahan about Awan Hearing...I thought I heard Stranahan reference Qs pov, being a positive reference. Saying that...(if I did recall that accurately) it's possible Doc C. may have layed his negative diabitribe (we know only to well about) about the Q movement (that shocked many of us) as he basically flipped his stance on Q back stabbing (us) Patriots here!
I'd give Stranahan space to digest this over time. How can he or anyone definitively claim Q is fake or not, being Anonymous.
Know one knows who Q is, as of now for sure. It takes time to digest Qs criptic messages & research to get a better handle on Q proofs.
I wouldn't be surprised in time if Lees position might change, yet his focus on Fact Based Journalism leads me to think I can see why he may remain skeptical.
Lees adamant statement if true that Q is a fake is a bit deterred from a fact vs. supposition stance.
To me how can one claim fake if know one actually knows who Q is???
In my Opinion.