Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 471875501208895498
It's not my goal to cluster them...
They are clustered.
It is done already by evolution
You, actually, are trying to ignore it.
okay if your goal is not to select for better traits along the lines of intelligence and temperament then what is it?
Why? Probably conditioning... saw too many star trek movies. Who knows
that doesn't answer my question
I asked if your goal *isn't* to select for better traits along the lines of intelligence and temperament then what is your goal?
Ask me my goal
Ok
The goal is to protect my group, Europeans.
And what we have and what we are
And to make them thrive grow and get better smarter and stronger
why do you want to protect Europeans?
Think of it this way: my race is my nation...it's a simplistic way to say it but should make sense to you
I'm european
What are you?
germanic european
in america
Ok good
So you understand.
Yes, that's a shame.
however I don't understand why you would protect an umbrella of 'European' when this group contains significant numbers of people with the same genetic standard in terms of intelligence/temperament as that of Africans
Because they are european.
that seems like rather circular logic
No, it's an axiom.
Like the other guy "I care about my country most" that's an axiom
My assertion is that race is more meaningful.
because of genetics, no?
Than legal territory
Unless they are one and the same
Because of everything I said race is earlier
I don't like dumb people in my race, just like the other guy doesn't like dumb people in his country..... But I hold race higher than country
why is race higher than country?
w/e I don't think we're going to agree anyways since we're operating from different principles
Already covered that
I don't seek agreement
yes I understand that
Race is the first most pre rational group you intrinsically belong to...
I would argue ethnicity has a far stronger basis
Also something I didn't mention, diversity in and of itself is a negative for society