you could debate that

communism denies hiearchy is egalitarian it rejects the tribalist collectivism nations stem from

but it's very close to "I will do anything I want cause I can"

I'm not saying actual communism can ever be achieved; it cannot

Communism and Fascism are two different kinds of collectivism

but people are dumb enough to try it

Communism wants gender and racial equality and a denial of hiearchy

same goes for total individualism

while fascism wants a complete hiearchy

again, communism ideally is total collectivism

well, those it considers in its collective

Fascism is not, but it recognizes the importance of components involving collective effort

considering rich people in your own nation aren't part of the collective lmao

Fascism is based on the organic reality of a nation state and the reality of a class based meritocracy within such a collective. These collectives themselves are divided in the world, hence, multiple conflicting and independent nations.

and I think that's an accurate understanding of macro human social relations

agreed

@everyone Daily Question🔖

Do you see Transhumanism overall as a benefit or detriment to humanity and why?

Detriment. We'll lose our soul if we become machines.

well

ban @Deleted User

That's quite a broad question

define transhumanism

^

Transhumanism? More like autism

So broad

detriment, b/c it will become a slippery slope to losing our humanity

Are heart monitors transhumanist?

Are fitwatches transhumanist

Transhumanism as in things like genetic engineering, advanced prosthetics, nanomachines, etc

Hmmmmmmmmm

well it could be both

depends how we use it

Am I a cyborg if I have dental fillings?

It's still too broad

^

Detriment, it is likely to cause us to be too uniform in design and expose us to unintended consequences like a disease that exploits the generic modification

Like it's up to the individual that decides how they're going to use their "transhumanism"

Can't really determine whether or not it's detrimental because it's just too broad.

In all seriousness, as with most technological advancements, it will change us, but probably for the better.

^

^