Message from @Diadochi

Discord ID: 497888077705117699


2018-10-05 21:01:08 UTC  

the non political version is simply yes

2018-10-05 21:01:35 UTC  

the political version with all implications involved is -> He must be confirmed, because the consequences would be too dire

2018-10-05 21:02:34 UTC  

I mean, there's allegations - I personally believe them due to evidence in the form of older therapist notes, before he was considered for the SCOTUS

2018-10-05 21:02:46 UTC  

But beyond that, he's got quite a terrible record in terms of what he's supported

2018-10-05 21:12:06 UTC  

The evidence for the allegations have been literally disproven though, there is nothing that can indicate that he was remotely involved.

in terms of what he supported I mean it depends im not particularly wel read in that field but generally I think he might be whats necessary to rectify a lot of what the US has going wrong in it. I mean its not like it will change much, its not like the deep state or any state actually provides change on it sown that is good for the people :/ Not this state at least

2018-10-05 21:30:13 UTC  

He supported the US threatening crimes against humanity to a civilian.

2018-10-05 21:30:21 UTC  

Someone completely innocent.

2018-10-05 21:30:38 UTC  

He also supported not allowing a lawsuit for the torture said civilian had to go through

2018-10-05 21:32:14 UTC  

He said that Exxon mobile shouldn't be charged for human rights violations they committed in Indonesia because the US didn't have jurisdiction in Indonesia

2018-10-05 21:32:46 UTC  

Even though it's a US company...

2018-10-05 21:33:00 UTC  

and thus, would need to be sued here

2018-10-05 21:35:02 UTC  

He's also advocated for the NSA and metadata collection

2018-10-05 21:35:12 UTC  

Arguing that it shouldn't be limited or blocked whatsoever

2018-10-05 21:36:32 UTC  

So unless you think that companies being prosecuted for violating human rights, a lack of torture, and not enough governmental wiretapping are all blights on America

2018-10-05 21:36:36 UTC  

you really shouldn't be for him

2018-10-05 21:36:41 UTC  

But hey, Trump nominated him.

2018-10-05 21:37:20 UTC  

I used to support Trump, but it's impossible to at this point.

2018-10-05 21:37:23 UTC  

It's a lost cause

2018-10-05 21:37:52 UTC  

Of course, while my ideology has heavily shifted...

2018-10-05 21:38:20 UTC  

I still don't see how one can justify supporting Trump or his nomination for the SC

2018-10-05 21:49:28 UTC  

Whether or not what is "torture" for what you're referencing is actually debatable. On top of that, if you murder someone and flee across a national border, you aren't tried in that new country. You're extradited to the country the crime was committed in. So, Exxon should be tried in Indonesia. *"But they're human rights violations!"* What kind of point is that? If an entity is committing human rights violations anywhere, they aren't held to the laws of a different land. Human rights are not American rights, they're __human__ rights. That means Exxon will not, and should not, be tried by the US government, but by an international court @SilverLining

2018-10-05 21:55:15 UTC  

That still doesn't cover the NSA wiretapping which he endorsed

2018-10-05 21:55:18 UTC  

Also, to add to that...

2018-10-05 22:01:26 UTC  

How is being secretly imprisoned, being denied due process, being denied counsel, being threatened with torture, forcibly disappeared (an international human rights violation), and tortured acceptable?

2018-10-05 22:01:33 UTC  

This was to a US citizen, done by US troops...

2018-10-05 22:01:43 UTC  

It's not "debatable" whatsoever

2018-10-05 22:02:08 UTC  

The crime committed was fleeing to Kenya from Somalia (where the American was studying abroad) after a civil war erupted.

2018-10-05 22:04:15 UTC  

Also, the citizens couldn't file their charges within Indonesia was the government, particularly the military, was complicit.

2018-10-05 22:06:13 UTC  

He also, of course, believes the president should not be able to be prosecuted

2018-10-05 22:06:43 UTC  

As in, the person who occupies the office of the president - not just Trump

2018-10-05 22:06:58 UTC  

He believed Nixon shouldn't have been persecuted in the Watergate Scandal

2018-10-05 22:30:15 UTC  

this is not epic

2018-10-05 23:34:54 UTC  

@SilverLining I have my reserves on the kid, however the issue of the wiretapping is an issue, IMHO I think Trump is a false revolutionary, here to appease the apetite of the potentially revolutionary right wing, bring the simmering water down a few degrees. Then when the waters have clamed, one, two terms later, the dems or the repubs will simply go and continue turning america into a dystopia

2018-10-05 23:35:18 UTC  

it seems to be a method of either 1) stopping the revolution or 2) controlling the revolution before, or after, it happens

2018-10-05 23:35:29 UTC  

are you talking about a right-leaning revolution?

2018-10-05 23:35:31 UTC  

because yeah, no

2018-10-06 01:50:41 UTC  

I feel like President Trump is a puppet to a bigger puppet.

2018-10-06 02:00:08 UTC  

The terms deep state

2018-10-06 03:04:02 UTC  

@JogaFlame Trump is /ourguy/

2018-10-06 03:04:11 UTC  

He is playing 5d chess

2018-10-06 03:04:34 UTC  

Hes too intelligent for you to understand his plans