Message from @SilverLining

Discord ID: 499775313304092673


2018-10-11 02:46:44 UTC  

that but unironically

2018-10-11 02:46:53 UTC  

i site dedicated to stopping a serial rapist

2018-10-11 02:46:55 UTC  

What was it that I said earlier about being allowed to call explanations into question?

By your same retarded logic, I should send you a Daily Stormer article and make the same retarded fallacy you're doing @SilverLining

2018-10-11 02:47:02 UTC  

You'd have no defense for it if I did

2018-10-11 02:47:12 UTC  

Data can be called into questiomn

2018-10-11 02:47:14 UTC  

What are you talking about?

2018-10-11 02:47:18 UTC  

...?

2018-10-11 02:47:19 UTC  

There is nothing wrong with that

2018-10-11 02:47:20 UTC  

Oh

2018-10-11 02:47:25 UTC  

You're saying that it's solely racial

2018-10-11 02:47:29 UTC  

If an explanation is unsatisfactory, then it can be questioned

2018-10-11 02:47:32 UTC  

Okay, the difference is that they offer an explanation

2018-10-11 02:47:39 UTC  

Explain how the explanation isn't satisfactory, then.

2018-10-11 02:47:40 UTC  

Please.

2018-10-11 02:47:44 UTC  

Ryan Faulk gives explanations too

2018-10-11 02:47:49 UTC  

I guess by your standard he's just as valid here

2018-10-11 02:47:54 UTC  

I want you to defend this point

2018-10-11 02:47:57 UTC  

Explain how stereotype threat, and varying social/educational backgrounds don't explain enough

2018-10-11 02:48:29 UTC  

Why would you reject an explanation from Ryan Faulk at face value, and then accept an explanation that YOU AGREE WITH at face value, simply because it is contradictory to explanation 1? @SilverLining

2018-10-11 02:48:34 UTC  

How are you not aware of what youa re doing?

2018-10-11 02:48:40 UTC  

What is Ryan Faulk's explanation?

2018-10-11 02:48:57 UTC  

If you're asking what his explanation is, you just missed the point

2018-10-11 02:49:23 UTC  

The point I was making is that you will refuse *anything* contradictory to your position, and accept *anything* that aids it, even if it's garbage

2018-10-11 02:49:32 UTC  

maybe just tell me?

2018-10-11 02:49:37 UTC  

How am I refusing it?

2018-10-11 02:49:51 UTC  

Someone explain to this woman that the conversation is not about Ryan Faulk

2018-10-11 02:49:57 UTC  

Is me offering a rebuttal, explaining why a certain anomaly exists, "refusing" it?

2018-10-11 02:50:11 UTC  

I'm accusing you of back unaware that you have a bias

2018-10-11 02:50:14 UTC  

*being unaware

2018-10-11 02:50:32 UTC  

You do too

2018-10-11 02:50:34 UTC  

Everyone has a bias

2018-10-11 02:50:35 UTC  

Of course I do

2018-10-11 02:50:40 UTC  

I'm aware I do

2018-10-11 02:50:57 UTC  

you're just saying I'm not

2018-10-11 02:51:09 UTC  

because I'm offering a rebuttal, and explaining why a certain argument isn't valid

2018-10-11 02:51:45 UTC  

Remember when you cited the IQ study, and the data didn't at all match with what you said.

And I responded with, "Well, it looks like this study was biased, so I'll just stop talking about it from now on."

2018-10-11 02:51:58 UTC  

What could I have done instead?

2018-10-11 02:51:59 UTC  

sorry what?

2018-10-11 02:52:03 UTC  

What are we talking about?

2018-10-11 02:52:12 UTC  

Did that happen this conversation?

2018-10-11 02:52:15 UTC  

No