Message from @SilverLining
Discord ID: 499775060731756544
You did what I said you would do, congratulations
different social and educational backgrounds
you mean actually cite the fucking thing you linked?
GASP
HOw dare I not take it at your word
and ignore the explanation
which this paper is about
that but unironically
i site dedicated to stopping a serial rapist
What was it that I said earlier about being allowed to call explanations into question?
By your same retarded logic, I should send you a Daily Stormer article and make the same retarded fallacy you're doing @SilverLining
You'd have no defense for it if I did
Data can be called into questiomn
What are you talking about?
...?
There is nothing wrong with that
Oh
You're saying that it's solely racial
If an explanation is unsatisfactory, then it can be questioned
Okay, the difference is that they offer an explanation
Please.
Ryan Faulk gives explanations too
I guess by your standard he's just as valid here
I want you to defend this point
Explain how stereotype threat, and varying social/educational backgrounds don't explain enough
Why would you reject an explanation from Ryan Faulk at face value, and then accept an explanation that YOU AGREE WITH at face value, simply because it is contradictory to explanation 1? @SilverLining
How are you not aware of what youa re doing?
What is Ryan Faulk's explanation?
If you're asking what his explanation is, you just missed the point
The point I was making is that you will refuse *anything* contradictory to your position, and accept *anything* that aids it, even if it's garbage
maybe just tell me?
How am I refusing it?
Someone explain to this woman that the conversation is not about Ryan Faulk
Is me offering a rebuttal, explaining why a certain anomaly exists, "refusing" it?
I'm accusing you of back unaware that you have a bias
*being unaware
You do too
Everyone has a bias
Of course I do
I'm aware I do