Retard

The "free download" requires a log in with an institution

I created an account just fine @SilverLining

Didnt need an institution

institution.

?

but yeah, it mentions towards the bottom of the preview page...

Log in to what exactly.

You did what I said you would do, congratulations

different social and educational backgrounds

you mean actually cite the fucking thing you linked?

GASP

HOw dare I not take it at your word

and ignore the explanation

which this paper is about

stopkavanaugh.com

that but unironically

i site dedicated to stopping a serial rapist

What was it that I said earlier about being allowed to call explanations into question?

By your same retarded logic, I should send you a Daily Stormer article and make the same retarded fallacy you're doing @SilverLining

You'd have no defense for it if I did

Data can be called into questiomn

What are you talking about?

...?

There is nothing wrong with that

Oh

You're saying that it's solely racial

If an explanation is unsatisfactory, then it can be questioned

Okay, the difference is that they offer an explanation

Explain how the explanation isn't satisfactory, then.

Please.

Ryan Faulk gives explanations too

I guess by your standard he's just as valid here

I want you to defend this point

Explain how stereotype threat, and varying social/educational backgrounds don't explain enough

Why would you reject an explanation from Ryan Faulk at face value, and then accept an explanation that YOU AGREE WITH at face value, simply because it is contradictory to explanation 1? @SilverLining

How are you not aware of what youa re doing?

What is Ryan Faulk's explanation?

If you're asking what his explanation is, you just missed the point

The point I was making is that you will refuse *anything* contradictory to your position, and accept *anything* that aids it, even if it's garbage

maybe just tell me?

How am I refusing it?